08 May 2003


WTC towers' strength NOT tested for fire....

This from today's New York Times:
Federal investigators studying the collapse of the twin towers on Sept. 11, 2001, say they now believe that the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the government agency that built the towers, never performed the fundamental tests needed to determine how their innovative structures would perform in a fire. [Emphasis mine.]

The preliminary finding, if it holds up, will undermine decades of public assurances by the Port Authority that the twin towers met or exceeded the requirements of New York City's building code, and therefore would be structurally safe in a large fire....
Not only that, it could make the Port Authority decision makers guilty of criminal homicide.

Not surprisingly, people are scrambling for cover.

The Port Authority has long maintained that it is not legally obligated to comply with the city and state's building codes, but has always insisted that it nonetheless did so in all its major construction, including the trade center.

"I would stress," Mr. Trevor added, "that none of the people who were involved in the making of those decisions at that time are currently working for the Port Authority."

One of those people, Guy Tozzoli, who oversaw all major aspects of the World Trade Center for the Port Authority at the time of its construction, said that his memory was imperfect, but that he thought full-scale tests on the floors and their supports most likely had not been done.

"I don't remember that being done, to be honest with you," Mr. Tozzoli said. "I know there was testing of the fireproofing material. But you are asking a different question. Whether we built a truss and tested that? I'm inclined to say no."

Many yesterday found that startling, even unthinkable.

Indeed.

The story also reports that fireproofing was inadequate; it was being upgraded at the time the towers were attacked.

Full story here.


Scariest man in America...?

You be the judge....
Here.

Graham update....

NPR this morning said "hundreds of thousands" are expected at Qualcomm Stadium for Billy Graham's appearances over the next 4 days.

But the stadium only holds, maximum, 70,000, I thought....I wondered if I'd gotten the capacity numbers wrong.

But, no, shortly after the NPR reporter confirmed them.

So, a capacity crowd every night times 4 would be 280,000. Technically, then, "hundreds of thousands" is correct, though highly misleading. Some --many?-- of those attendees will be repeats.

It's kinda of the opposite of what the media does for peace demonstrations. Then, they'll call a quarter of a million marchers, "thousands." Here, they make sure they count every head, now and again, 4 times.

And, can you ever imagine the media adding up the numbers of peace demonstrators over a multi-day event, and announcing that as the total number to the public? In your dreams!

The driver of the shuttle I take to work everyday told a passenger this morning that someone he knew had flown into town just to see Graham. "We'll be there tonight!" he said, adding that he's taking off work for it.

Not only do I feel like I'm living in the wrong town, I'm living in the wrong universe.

06 May 2003


Working-class Republicans....

You gotta admit, the Right knows how to organize. How to motivate activists to work--or at least, vote--against their own self-interests.

My brother, 57, is a case in point. All his working life he's busted his balls selling cars. Not the most esteemed profession, I know, but he's given it his all. And he's got a laundry list of stress-related health problems to prove it.

In fact, both he and his wife are suffering from a variety of serious health ailments. Yet the last time I checked, he still had no employer-paid health-insurance; instead, he was paying out-of-pocket for Blue Cross or some similar high-premium limited-coverage plan.

I don't think he's ever accrued in one year more than two week's paid vacation--and that's working since he was in his early 20's for the same employer. Who's done quite nicely, thank you very much, off the sweat and tears of my brother and others like him.

Nor has either of my brother's two sons earned a college-degree--at least in part due to no money to spare for college tuition.

So, does my brother support progressive politics? Does he vote for a candidate who promises healthcare reform or represents the interests of workers like him? Is he in favor of tax-reform to make corporations and the wealthy pay their fair share?

No. Not only has he been a staunch Republican since he cast his first presidential vote for Nixon, he is a devoted fan of such Right-Wing luminaries as Rush Limbaugh. He vehemently despises Bill Clinton and adores G.W. And, though we haven't dared broach the topic, I assume he's gung-ho pro-war. After all, he and his wife signed the papers for their first-born son to enlist in the Marines when he was just 17.

My nephew hasn't been the same since he was discharged--early, for some unnamed health reason. Now 33, he drifts across the country from menial job to menial job, embittered, no friends, fascinated with all sorts of war weaponry and spouting Right-Wing ideology, distorted historical points of view and reactionary Catholic dogma.

That's right, religion has long played a role in my brother's conservative stance. Doesn't it always? As I stroll the state university campus where I work, I see more religious and conservative political fliers than I ever see progressive tracts. Just now, for instance, there's a huge banner dominating the central quad advertising Billy Graham's mission to San Diego.

Graham and his entourage have reserved Qualcomm Stadium for the next 4 days. That's San Diego's football stadium--baseball, too, until construction on the controversial downtown ballpark is completed. A 166-acre, open-air amphitheater that holds between 66 and 70 thousand people.

Imagine. They're expecting that many people daily to attend Graham's religious revival....Will they come?

Judge for yourself: out of the blue yesterday, a woman who was assisting me on the phone at a local medical clinic burst out, in a whiny, nasal, 5-year-old tone, "I really wanna go!"

Not sure whom she was addressing, thinking she was wanting to leave for the day her wonderful phone-answering job as it was almost 5 p.m., I responded, "Long day, huh?"

"Ahhh, no," she said, as if on cue. "Actually, I was talking about something else...Billy Graham, you know, is going to be at Qualcomm this weekend? And I really wanna go!" (whiny voice again). She then proceeded to regale me with details of the televangelist's scheduled appearance.

Afraid to have the message to my doctor go mysteriously missing--I'd waited ten minutes on-hold already just to get a person on the line--I let her prattle on. But I was annoyed.

Among other things, I wanted to ask, "Does what you're doing here constitute witnessing for Jesus? Are you earning brownie points in heaven for making me, a captive audience, uncomfortable and irritated? And getting paid for it?"

In the end, my self-interest, namely, wanting to get my message through intact, won out. I didn't confront her.

Which brings me back to my original point. How does the Right win over so many working-class voters when they consistently, systematically and unceasingly work against workers' interests?

Conservative leaders have done everything in their power these past 20+ years to sink every social program that has ever benefited working people, while at the same time shipping almost every living-wage, blue-collar job overseas and making a fortune in the bargain. Never mind! They still own the devoted loyalty of those selfsame workers.

At the rate we're going, not my brother, the phone operator, nor the woman I work with--who is vehemently against the clerical union that represents our interests in negotiations with the Goliathan University of California system--will ever achieve the vaunted American Dream. Republicans--and, to a lesser degree, Democrats--have made sure of that.

Instead, they will labor harder and harder, chipmunks on a treadmill, probably through their dying days without pensions and social security, to hold onto whatever financial high ground they've managed to sandbag. Meanwhile, the rich will sip Martinis and look on from the safety of their gated communities as the rising waters of the Global Economy engulf and drown us all.

But, hey, you gotta admit: the Right knows how to draw a crowd.

The emperor has no clothes....

It looks like the Germans are about to get slammed for telling it like it is....
THE strained relations between Germany and the United States took a turn for the worse yesterday after a senior Berlin diplomat was reported to have told Foreign Ministry colleagues that America was turning into a “police state”.

The comments of Jürgen Chrobog, the State Secretary, reported in the German Focus magazine, threatened to disrupt intense diplomatic efforts to repair the relationship between Gerhard Schröder, the Chancellor, and President Bush.

According to the article, there have been only two (!) telephone conversations between Bush and Schroder since the Chancellor won the German election last September, and only a few sparse words have been exchanged at summits.

Way to go, Bush! You show 'em that the most powerful military force in the history of the planet is under the petulant command of a man with the emotional development of a five-year-old. (Or does that comparison slight five-year-olds?)

Complete story here in the Times/UK.

Can you believe this...?!

From The Independent, UK, via Common Dreams:
The parents of a British peace activist who was shot in the head by Israeli troops came under fire themselves as they traveled to the spot where their son was critically injured.

Anthony and Jocelyn Hurndall were in a British diplomatic convoy entering the town of Rafah in the Gaza Strip when Israeli soldiers at a checkpoint fired a shot, which passed narrowly over the top of their vehicles.

The incident on Saturday afternoon took place despite the Israeli Army being given notice of the journey on at least three occasions – the last minutes before the convoy arrived. [Emphasis mine.]
If this doesn't convince you that the Israeli Defense Forces are out of control, I don't know what will.

The two British cars were identifiable by their white diplomatic plates. They were passing through the checkpoint "very, very slowly," in broad daylight. The convoy came to an immediate stop, but it was not until British Defense attaché, Colonel Tom Fitzalan-Howard, had stepped from one of the cars with his hands in the air to talk with the soldiers inside the tower, that they were able to proceed.

Remember: the Israelis shot the 21-year-old British son of these two people, downing him with a high-velocity bullet as he moved towards two frightened Palestinian children three-and-a-half weeks ago. He still lingers in a coma in an Israeli hospital.

Full story here.

05 May 2003


SARS virus found to be robust....

This from today's L.A. Times online:
The virus that causes SARS can survive in the environment much longer than researchers had suspected, the World Health Organization said Sunday, suggesting that halting transmission of the disease may be harder than they thought.

Research from laboratories around the world, posted on the WHO's Web site, indicates that the SARS coronavirus can persist on public surfaces for a day or longer and in feces from infected people for as long as four days — much longer than the coronaviruses that cause the common cold. It can survive even longer at low temperatures. And one commonly used detergent does not kill the virus as readily as researchers had hoped.

"This is the first time we have had hard data on the survival of the virus," said Dr. Klaus Stohr of the WHO, which is based in Geneva. "Before, we were just speculating."

Stohr cautioned that the full meaning of the findings will not become clear until researchers learn how much virus is necessary to trigger an infection. That the virus can persist for hours on, say, handrails in a bus station may not be important if there is not enough of the virus present to produce disease.
As of Sunday, SARS has sickened more than 6,300 people worldwide and killed at least 449--none in the U.S. Cases seem to be declining in Hong Kong and China; the latter having tripled the amount of money targeted for the disease to $725 million over the weekend. But authorities are concerned about the situation in Taiwan, where the spread of the disease seems to be accelerating.

Complete story here.

Concern for women's rights in Iraq....

Remember how, prior to the invasion of Afghanistan--way back when--the Bush administration cited the Taliban's repression of women and girls as an important reason to invade the country?

Well, women's rights seem to have played no role in the Bush administration's grand designs for Iraq.

Now that we've "liberated" the country, women find themselves in a more precarious position than ever as Islamic fundamentalists of all persuasions use the ensuing power-vacuum to slug it out in a brutal power-struggle.

Iraqi women, formerly among the most liberated in the region, are watching the rise of fundamentalism with dread.
"I want to move freely, live a joyful life out in the open," said Nimo Din'Kha Skander, the owner of the salon [Nimo's]. Nimo's is small but well known; Ms. Din'Kha Skander likes to recall how Saddam Hussein's second wife had her hair done there.

"I don't want a government of religion," Ms. Din'Kha Skander continued. Religion, she said, is "a private thing."
From this and other articles, I get the distinct feeling we just pulled the rug out from under the very Iraqis--in the upper and middle classes-- who were the strongest proponents of gender equity.

The article blames, among other things, the constraints and privations of the U.N.-sponsored sanctions for creating a generation more socially and religiously conservative than their parents.
Suha Turaihi, a retired diplomat who served in India, elaborated: "For 20 years they didn't travel — they were not exposed to Western values as we were. They are children of wars and embargo."
So, while talk of "traditional values" falls on the young's more receptive ears, women in the story put their hope in Iraq's diverse cultures and religions, believing no single group could easily monopolize power. (Unless under a dictator?)

Ironically, they also count on U.S. repression.

Criticizing Americans for mismanaging the postwar occupation and being slow to restore public services, one woman says,
"We are used to having coups and revolutions. But usually people who stage them take over the country afterward."
Ah, what fertile ground for Jeffersonian democratic ideals!

Full story here.

And by the way, what ever happened to those imperiled Afghani women and girls? Especially the ones unlucky enough to reside outside the boundaries of American control in and around Kabul?

We don't hear much about them from the Bush administration anymore, do we?

04 May 2003


This just in...!

Jennifer Miller and Circus Amok will be performing this Tuesday! May 6th, at Galapagos, in Williamsburg (Brooklyn), NY.

Miller will join actress and peace activist, Janeane Garofalo, Lee Gough, of Military Families Speak Out, and John Kim, of Veterans for Peace, and others. Music provided by The Trachtenberg Family Slide Show Players, Danny Kelly and John Dyer, with sound & visual art by April Koester and DJ Andrew.

You lucky New Yorkers! I have wanted to meet Miller since seeing her in the film, "Juggling Gender," at the San Francisco Lesbian and Gay Film Festival in the early 1990's. To quote a promo for the film:
...Miller [is] a lesbian performer who lives her life with a full beard. Miller works as a performance artist, circus director, clown and as the "bearded lady" in one of the only remaining sideshows in America. In public she is often mistaken for a man, an experience she handles with the wit and intelligence that characterize her stage performances. Her lifestyle suggests the impossibility of defining anyone as truly feminine or masculine...

She is truly awesome!

The event is sponsored by Peace Williamsburg to raise funds for Madre, a feminist non-profit organization dedicated to building real alternatives to war and violence through a people-to-people exchange of direct relief and understanding.

Remember: Tuesday May 6. Galapagos, in Williamsburg (Brooklyn), NY, 80 N. 6th Street. Showtime: 7:30 - 11:00p.m. $8.

Be there!

More about Circus Amok here.

03 May 2003


Israeli soldiers kill British journalist....

I am stunned that the mounting toll of foreigners killed by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) gets such short shrift in the U.S. media.

I have come to expect an appalling level of callousness when it comes to Palestinian deaths; after all, Americans have long de-humanized Palestinians, seeing them all as terrorists. This level of ignorance and prejudice is particularly unforgivable considering that the Israeli army's deadly toll on Palestinians is perpetrated with American foreign-aid dollars.

But I would have thought when the Israelis started shooting American, Danish and British peace activists and now a British journalist--not to mention, running down 21-year-old American, Rachel Corrie, with a bulldozer--the American media might have changed its tone. So far, it seems not. The coverage remains sparse and surprisingly forgiving.

The latest death was reported by Agence France Presse (via Common Dreams):
British television journalist James Miller died after being shot by Israeli troops in the southern town of Rafah in the Gaza Strip.

An Israeli army spokesman expressed "regret" at the death, but pointed out that the man had "taken great risks by being in a virtual war zone."

Miller, 35, was hit as he was filming a stand-up segment as part of a documentary he was making on the army's destruction of hundreds of homes of militants in the Palestinian territories.
Complete story here.

The standard--one might say, reflexive--IDF routine is apparent here. The Isreali military spokesperson expresses regret and claims "it was a mistake," or is "under investigation." Then the victim is blamed. Invariably, the attitude seems to be, put yourself in the path of my bullet, and your death is your fault, for my right to pull the trigger is inalienable.

Just how many "mistakes" need to happen before the actions are viewed as premeditated policy?

According to Agence France Presse, Miller's death brings to 3,207 the number of people killed in Israel and Palestine--2,419 Palestinians and 729 Israelis--since September, 2000.

You remember what happened then? On September 28, Ariel Sharon--then Israel's opposition leader, not yet prime minister--took a 34-minute stroll at the most disputed site in Jerusalem, what Jews call the Temple Mount and Palestinians the Haram as-Sharif mosque complex. He made sure to bring along some 1,000 armed soldiers and police officers, forestalling any pretext that he didn't know exactly what a provocation his actions represented. The resultant riots involved hundreds of Palestinians civilians and Israeli law enforcement forces and evolved into what is now called the Al Aqsa Intifada.

Sharon made the most of the havoc he had ignited, bringing down a government and parlaying a law-and-order platform into two consecutive terms as Israeli prime-minister.

Many of those killed by Israeli forces in the ensuing carnage have been children. The International Press Center (IPC) website, sponsored by the Palestinian State Information Service (SIS) says the following about the children killed and the IDF excuse that their deaths are mistakes:
...You find that “mistakes” are positively littering the Palestinian landscape. Israel may cling to the fallacy that the IDF is the most moral army in the world, but as the number of child deaths approaches 400, it is surely the most error-prone.

In the first Intifada, Israeli journalist Amira Hass calculated that a child was killed by the IDF every two weeks. In the current Intifada, that figure has climbed to three and a half every week. That’s seven every two weeks — an escalation of 700%. Careless, careless, careless.

Of course, it is absurd to try to continue categorizing this number of slain children as accidents. To use Amira Hass again, an IDF soldier rather gives the game away in her now famous Ha’aretz interview: “12 and up, you’re allowed to shoot ,” he said. “That’s what they tell us.”
Full piece here.

For those who don't know, Amira Hass is an Israeli reporter who lives and works in the occupied territories and whose work regularly appears in the Israeli daily Ha'aretz. For samples, go here.

02 May 2003


And a prophet of another sort....

Lacanian-Marxist philosopher, Slavoj Zizek, from Slovenia, is the subject of a profile by Rebeccca Mead in The New Yorker, on sale now. Three quotes bear repeating here (transcribed by hand):
"You probably saw the movie 'Minority Report,' in which people are arrested before they commit the crime," [Zizek] said. "Why does this sound familiar? This is the new model for international relations. The U.S. knows in advance who will attack you."
Like, I suspect, many of Zizek's quotes, this works both in the facetious sense, and--judging from the information Bush is trying to suppress in the 9/11 report--the factual sense.

Then, invoking the manipulation inherent in the "war on terror":
"The terrorist attack is taken for granted, but endlessly postponed," he said. "The true catastrophe is that we are living under a permanent threat of catastrophe."
Finally, in reference to what he calls the "creeping social change" this has brought about, illustrated by, among other things, the fact that "torture has become a legitimate subject of conversation," Zizek observed,
"It is not that the ends justify the means; the end is the means themselves."

Very interesting guy. But you've got to buy or borrow the magazine to read more.

War prophets profit....

How many in the Bush administration have links to the oil industry?
ExxonMobil, the world's biggest privately owned oil group and a target of street protesters, celebrated May Day by reporting the largest quarterly corporate profits in history at $7.04bn (£4.4bn).

[...]

Fadel Gheit, oil analyst with New York brokerage Fahnstock & Co, said groundbreaking profits had been driven by the Iraq war and strikes in Venezuela and Nigeria. "They [Exxon] had a very strong wind in their sail and they happened to have a very big sail....

That $7.04bn is in comparison to $2.09bn last year. More than three times the pleasure! And they're not the only one.

However, analysts say the record first-quarter profits will not be repeated because oil prices have already started to fall as the conflict in Iraq comes to an end.

Awww...but no worries: they can always start a war in another oil-producing nation!

Story here via Common Dreams.

Second thoughts....

On my strong criticism of the Hyde AIDS bill, passed yesterday.

I remain outraged that conservatives have attached religiously-braided strings to the money, especially in a nation founded on the principle of separation of church and state.

That said, the amount of aid approved deserves recognition. Depending on reports, it either doubles or even triples the amount the U.S. formerly budgeted to fight AIDS worldwide. And it will be going to a variety of programs, even to those that distribute condoms.

What peeves me, however, is the amount of adulation being showered on the administration for doing, in part only, the right thing for a change. The thing which, in reality, should have been done decades ago.

The lack of context and criticism in the media coverage illustrates a disturbing trend, in which an extremely conservative administration--in this case, Bush's--deviates slightly in its overwhelmingly reactionary path and is praised to the heights for its "bi-partisanship" or its "defiance" of party radicals, or its largess. When in reality, what Congress (and Bush) did yesterday only looks good by comparison to their normally abysmal record.

The rest is government and corporately-owned media spin.

Religious conservatives: 34; Women's reproductive freedom: 1.

Still, it makes you more hopeful....
UNITED NATIONS - Two American women angered by the U.S. decision to stop funding the U.N. population agency said Thursday their grassroots campaign has so far raised $1 million for the agency, money that will go to helping women in poor nations.

More than 100,000 people - the vast majority Americans - have contributed to their campaign, which began in October, after President Bush blocked $34 million for the U.N. Population Fund last year, accusing the agency of tolerating abortions and forced sterilizations in China.[Emphasis mine.]
Jane Roberts, a retired teacher from California, and Lois Abraham, a lawyer from New Mexico, are still a long way from their stated goal of raising the entire $34 million that has been withheld. But media mogul Ted Turner's United Nations Foundation, created to manage his $1 billion gift to the U.N., announced it would match the campaign's donations with 25 cents to the dollar, up to a total of $250,000. Moreover, 200 letters with contributions arrive every day.

The women plan to take the campaign worldwide, starting in Europe on May 7.

Complete story here via Common Dreams.

Will they get away with it...?

The following is from Newsweek, via Common Dreams:
Even as White House political aides plot a 2004 campaign plan designed to capitalize on the emotions and issues raised by the September 11 terror attacks, administration officials are waging a behind-the-scenes battle to restrict public disclosure of key events relating to the attacks.
Astonishingly, the Bush administration is not only blocking efforts to release an 800+-page report, prepared by a joint congressional inquiry into the intelligence and law-enforcement failures that preceded 9/11, they're seeking to reclassify materials that are already widely disseminated.

Like the now famous July, 2001, Phoenix-FBI memo reporting that Middle Eastern nationals might be enrolling in U.S. flight schools. The article quoted one intelligence official as saying, just because something has been inadvertently released, doesn't make it unclassified.

And they impeached Clinton for his verbal quibbling!

According to Newsweek, the administration's motives for keeping the report under wraps could be to avoid political embarrassment (No...!) or merely in response to the ingrained culture of secrecy that permeates the highest levels of the White House. (Why not both?) Whichever, the two congressional members who oversaw the report--Democratic Sen. Bob Graham and Republican Rep. Porter Goss--are said to be really mad and they're preparing a letter of complaint to Vice President Dick Cheney.

Oh yeah, that will solve the problem.

The real question is, will the electorate let Bush conceal his administration's failings vis-a-vis 9/11, and at the same time re-elect him when he cynically plays on the terrible event's strong emotions?
...The White House is delaying the Republican nominating convention, scheduled for New York City, until the first week in September 2004-the latest in the party's history. That would allow Bush's acceptance speech, now slated for Sept. 2, to meld seamlessly into 9-11 commemoration events due to take place in the city the next week. [This makes me physically ill....]

Some sources who have read the still-secret congressional report say some sections would not play quite so neatly into White House plans. One portion deals extensively with the stream of U.S. intelligence-agency reports in the summer of 2001 suggesting that Al Qaeda was planning an upcoming attack against the United States-and implicitly raises questions about how Bush and his top aides responded. One such CIA briefing, in July 2001, was particularly chilling and prophetic. It predicted that Osama bin Laden was about to launch a terrorist strike in the coming weeks, the congressional investigators found. The intelligence briefing went on to say: The attack will be spectacular and designed to inflict mass casualties against U.S. facilities or interests. Attack preparations have been made. Attack will occur with little or no warning.
Newsweek sources claim Bush himself was present at that briefing.

It will come as no surprise that some administration officials are expressing regret that the sensitive material was ever provided to Congress in the first place. Yep, this is an administration that believes strongly in checks and balances!

We have got to make sure that Bush does not win a second term.

Complete story here.

01 May 2003


Looks like my skepticism was warranted after all....

The House passed, by a 375-41 vote, the Hyde bill that I talked about yesterday, which would more than double U.S. contributions to the worldwide fight against AIDS. But not without Conservative's tacking on two amendments.
The House approved, 220-197, an amendment by Rep. Joe Pitts, R-Pa., requiring that one-third of funds spent on prevention go to abstinence programs. ``It's important that we not just send them money, but we send them values that work,'' said Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., a supporter of Pitts' proposal.
And....
The House approved an amendment by Rep. Christopher Smith, R-N.J., to strengthen protections for religious groups. Smith and others said that Catholic groups, which object to condom distribution, care for one-fourth of AIDS victims worldwide.
The White House even issued a statement supporting language that would ``prioritize the abstinence component of the ABC [Uganda's AIDS program] approach.''

So, yesterday's L.A. Times story, claiming wide support in the House only if the amendments were left off, was misleading, to say the least.

And, Bush's "rare defiance of the social conservatives within his own party," emphasized in yesterday's N.Y. Times article, was a downright lie.

From what I'm reading, Bush and his Right-Wing fundamentalist cronies haven't changed their AIDS agenda at all. They've simply agreed to give more money to the fight against a worldwide epidemic that is devastating Africa and other third-world nations--and which, in the 1980's, decimated the Gay community.

And being very self-congratulatory about it. Look at these quotes:
``So much of what we do is really unimportant and trivial, but not today,'' said Hyde, R-Ill., chief sponsor of the measure...

``We are doing probably the greatest thing that we have done since I have been in Congress,'' said Rep. Donald Payne, an eight-term Democrat from New Jersey.
More money is good--don't get me wrong. Also, don't try to tell me the zebra is changing his stripes when all he's really doing is rolling around in the mud.

Whole story here.

Only in San Diego....

In NPR's pledge-drive this morning, they were hyping a challenge grant for matching funds from "Gays and Lesbians for Programming Excellence," while at the same time an announcer was enthusiastically promoting the president's visit to San Diego and scheduled speech this evening. The reporter was waxing nostalgic about a night he spent on the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln where Bush is to give the speech and also sleep the night.

I am surprised....

I woke up this morning to news that the U.S. will be closing its military bases in Saudi Arabia.

Wow....That act alone, had it been accomplished without war, would have done more to protect Americans from future terrorist attacks from Arab radicals than anything Bush has done to date.

Of course, there has been a war. And, some rumors suggest the U.S. might relocate its military bases from a temporary home in Qatar to Iraq. The Bush administration is denying those rumors. So we'll see.

In the meantime, we'll also see if the unpopular Saudi regime can stand on its own.

30 April 2003


Whoo-whoo...!

You've probably all seen this one by now....
BAGHDAD - The retired general overseeing Iraq's postwar reconstruction said on Wednesday that his fellow Americans should beat their chests with pride at having toppled Saddam Hussein without destroying the country's assets.

"We ought to be beating our chests every day. We ought to look in a mirror and get proud and stick out our chests and suck in our bellies and say: 'Damn, we're Americans!'," Jay Garner told reporters.....

Funny, no mention of the Iraqi National Museum....The next quote clarifies the Bush administration's priorities--if there was ever any doubt.
"I was planning on the oilfields [sic] being torched, a huge humanitarian crisis and a monumental reconstruction task, " he said.

"There is no humanitarian crisis ... and there's not much infrastructure problem here, other than getting the electrical grid structure back together."
No humanitarian crisis? Not much infrastructure problem? (Odd sentence infrastructure, though.) Obviously, all these guys ever cared about was damage to their precious oil fields.

One more thing: hasn't humanity evolved beyond the chest-beating stage?!

I wish we could round up all these smug, selfish, Right-Wing, homophobic, nationalistic, fundamentalist chauvinist types--of all religious and national stripes--so hellbent on fighting bombing torturing poisoning drilling polluting surveilling hoarding and hypocritically forbidding, give them an empty, lifeless planet of their own, and let them go at one another to their little hearts content, while leaving the rest of us to live our lives honorably, generously, sustainably and in peace!

Or, at the very least, I wish that Bush had accepted Hussein's pre-war challenge to a duel and the war had ended there.

Article here. Thanks to Common Dreams and This Modern World.


ABC's con't....

I just read the L.A. Times story on the Hyde AIDS bill, and it also took the line that Bush is opposing his conservative base on this one. The article says the bill has wide House support, as long at the proposed amendments (re: abstinence set-asides and religious exemptions) are left off.

Hmmmm...maybe my skepticism is misplaced here. Or maybe this is yet another instance of the lapdog press licking the hand that feeds them. Either way, this will be one bill to watch as it makes its way through Congress.

L.A. Times story here.

Let's all recite our ABC's now....

In a N.Y. Times story on a House bill, sponsored by Rep. Henry J. Hyde, R-Illinois, that would triple American global AIDS spending to $15 billion over the next 5 years, sending money to prevention and treatment programs in 12 African nations, Haiti and Guyana, the reporter makes it sound like President Bush has uncharacteristically put saving the lives of AIDS sufferers ahead of religious dogma.
WASHINGTON, April 29 — In rare defiance of the social conservatives within his own party, President Bush today urged Congress to fight AIDS internationally with a $15 billion plan that advocates condom use and in effect permits money to go to groups that promote abortion.
Read between the lines, though, and it becomes clear Bush hasn't had a sudden change of heart.
...he [Bush] was careful to make one of his central arguments in the biblical language of Christian conservatives, many of whom have taken on fighting AIDS as a moral cause.

"When we see a plague leaving graves and orphans across a continent, we must act," Mr. Bush said. "When we see the wounded traveler on the road to Jericho, we will not — America will not — pass to the other side of the road."
The president still strongly supports the conservatives' position that abstinence is the only cure for AIDS. He has not backed down from federal government policy, in effect since Reagan's presidency, that prevents U.S. AIDS money from going to international groups that promote abortion. In fact, Congressional conservatives plan to amendment the Hyde bill to set aside a third of the money for abstinence programs and to exempt religious groups from having to hand out condoms.

Here's the heart of the Conservative's AIDS prevention plan, modeled on Uganda's "A.B.C. Campaign," and endorsed in the Hyde bill:
...First, abstain. If you can't abstain, be faithful. And if you can't be faithful, use a condom.
Sounds more like catechism than an endorsement of what the mainstream medical establishment has concluded is the most effective means of preventing the spread of AIDS: responsible condom use.

So, why did the reporter open with such a deceptively upbeat lead? Maybe the answer lies in the article's final paragraph:
Congressional aides who have visited humanitarian groups in Africa said today that the amendments — and the administration's commitment to make sure that AIDS money does not mingle with money for family planning — had little to do with how the groups actually operated. They acknowledged that the last-minute haggling was entirely driven by American domestic politics.

While I firmly believe in the final sentence, I'd hate to put my faith--and the lives of potential AIDS sufferers--in the hands of "Congressional aides." We've seen this administration's track record on truth-telling regarding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

As a reporter, I interviewed AIDS workers from Africa in the early 1990's. One person told me of a Catholic priest, in a remote parish--I can't remember the country--who was counseling his parishioners to destroy condoms because it was a sin to use them.

At the time, health worker after health worker from Africa was telling me how they had solid AIDS education and prevention programs in place, the local population was receptive to the message of condom-use, but there were no condoms. They were too expensive and beyond the reach of poverty-stricken African health budgets.

How many people died of AIDS on account of the priest who made piles of hard-to-get condoms and burned them?

Conservative in Congress, preaching abstinence, opposing condom distribution and de-funding abortion, have blood on their hands.

Meanwhile, in China....

BEIJING, April 30 — In a live, televised news conference today the new acting Mayor of Beijing called the SARS epidemic severe and uncontrolled as he sought to convince a panicky public that the battle against the dangerous, fatal new disease is effectively joined at last.

[...]

Beijing imposed stringent quarantine measures only in the last week, as the reported number of confirmed SARS cases in Beijing was zooming 10 days ago from below 350 to 1,440 today, not including a similar high total of suspected cases.

About 9,000 city residents have been put in isolation because of possible exposure to the infection, officials reported this morning.

The city's public health agencies were overwhelmed by the sudden, initially denied outbreak and still are unable to perform vital analysis of how fast the virus is spreading and where.

For the whole story, go here.

WHO lifts Toronto travel advisory....

TORONTO, April 29 — Citing an ebb in the SARS epidemic here, the World Health Organization today lifted a week-old advisory urging travelers to delay all nonessential visits to Toronto.

The decision was welcomed with sighs of relief from Canadian officials, who had lobbied hard for the reversal and disputed the W.H.O. contention that Toronto had been a source of cases outside Canada. They argued that the advisory unnecessarily damaged the Canadian economy and its international image.

But the reversal of an advisory declared only last Wednesday raised questions about the W.H.O.'s decision-making process and whether it had given in to intense pressure from a country with enormous sway in the agency's parent organization, the United Nations.

What do you think? Me, I suspect that lifting the advisory won't make a whole lot of difference, at this point. People who would have heeded it are unlikely to suddenly feel safe to visit. And those who visit now, probably would have gone before.

Full story here.

Again...?

FALLUJA, Iraq, April 30 — United States soldiers opened fire here today on marchers protesting a clash late Monday night in which 15 anti-American demonstrators were reported killed by American troops. The city's mayor and hospital officials said two protesters were killed in today's incident and 14 were wounded.

A United States Army officer said soldiers in a convoy passing the demonstrators were shot at, and then returned fire. There was no immediate indication of any American casualties.

About 1,000 residents marching down Falluja's main street stopped today in front of a battalion headquarters of the United States Army's 82nd Airborne Division, in a compound formerly occupied by Saddam Hussein's Baath Party. The demonstrators were carrying signs condemning Monday night's shooting. [Emphasis mine.]

I was surprised to find out that the Americans have occupied the former Baath Party headquarters in Falluja. Now, isn't it simple common sense that when you've invaded a country to "liberate" it from a generally unpopular regime and you're trying to reassure the populace that you are definitely not there to replace that regime or occupy their country, you would distance yourself in every way possible from the regime? Like, for instance, not setting up your command center in their former headquarters ?

Of course, you also would avoid shooting unarmed demonstrators. But what do I know?

Judging from the following quote, Lt. Col. Tobin Green, commander of the Second Squadron of the Third Armored Cavalry Regiment, which is taking over from the 82nd Airborne in Falluja (and getting off to a smashing start), is an ardent follower of our fearless national leader.
"The evildoers are deliberately placing at risk the good civilians," Colonel Green told The Associated Press. "These are deliberate actions by the enemy to use the population as cover."

Yes, and your's and the president's vocabulary and worldview have not evolved since the second grade.

I'm sure Colonel Green will quickly grasp the complexity of the sensitive, volatile situation and we can expect a vast improvement in the upcoming days.

Full story here.

29 April 2003


Just who exactly is a "good" American...?

The anniversary is fast approaching of another peace demonstration in which innocent protestors were shot dead by soldiers poorly trained at crowd control....
The facts are these: On May 4, 1970, Kent State University students rallied to protest President Nixon's decision to expand the Vietnam conflict into Cambodia. Poorly trained Ohio National Guard troops were called to the campus, where, after some mild skirmishing with the students, they fired without warning, killing four and wounding nine. Only one of the casualties had been harassing the Guard; another had been on her way to class when she was shot and killed.
David Kirby's op-ed in today's Christian Science Monitor, goes on to talk about pro-war sentiment--and hypocrisy--during times of national crisis.
A nationwide Gallup telephone poll taken on May 13 and 14 [1970] found that 58 percent of the respondents thought the students responsible for the deaths while only 11 percent blamed the National Guard (31 percent had no opinion).

This antiprotestor sentiment wasn't a momentary aberration, either: Five years later, in a federal civil trial against the guardsmen and the politicians who sent them onto the campus, the jury voted 9 to 3 for the defendants, a decision later reversed on appeal.

[...]

Many of my clients [Kirby was a draft counselor then] hated the war, but just as many thought American boys should answer the call proudly - other American boys, that is. These young men were pro-war, but they didn't relish going to battle themselves...Nowadays, media images and selective memories make it seem as though most people who lived through that time were opposed to the war. Back then, it didn't seem that way at all.

Curiously, recent revelations show that the very architects of the Vietnam war were opposed to it.

In 1995, former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara confessed in his memoirs that he had known the war was wrong.

And from Michael Beschloss's "Reaching for Glory: The Secret Lyndon Johnson Tapes, 1964-1965," we learn that, very early in the war, Johnson confessed, "I don't think it's worth fighting for, and I don't think we can get out."

I seriously doubt history will show similar doubt or regret on the parts of Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Perle. One of the scariest things about these guys is how absolutely cocksure of themselves they are. Like crusaders throughout history, they genuinely believe "God" is on their side.

Kirby concludes powerfully, in words that could just as well apply to today.

Who was the "good American" in 1970? We may tell ourselves differently now, but the truth is it was someone who thought the cowards with blood on their hands in the White House were swell fellows.

It's easy to blame our political leaders for the things we don't like. But we need to remember that these leaders take their cues from the public that keeps them in office, a public that, in this case, said the war was OK and that anybody who opposed it was wrong. Indeed, anybody who merely attended college on a campus where protests occurred ran the risk of being shot dead walking to class.

(Thanks, Chad, for the heads-up on this...!)

Hate to say we told you so....

ALLUJAH, Iraq, April 30 — United States soldiers opened fire on Iraqis at an antiwar demonstration here, and according to local hospital officials killed 15 people and wounded about 75. An American officer said today that the troops opened fire after being "intentionally" shot at by some of the protesters, a claim disputed by residents.

Local people said the firing by the Americans was unprovoked as about 200 to 300 demonstrators late Monday night roamed between the United States Army headquarters and in front of a local school, which the Americans took over a few days ago.

The demonstrators "intentionally engaged American soldiers," said Capt. Mike Riedmuller, commanding officer of an Army troop with the Third Armored Cavalry Regiment in Fallujah, 30 miles west of Baghdad.

Well, of course we fired! They deliberately enraged us. What else do you do when somebody, whose country you've just bombed to rubble and whose (grammar?) school you've just occupied, deliberately enrages you by holding a peace demonstration?

Riedmuller claimed that American soldiers only fired shots on people with weapons, yet at least one 15-year-old 9th-grader, Ahmed Mohammed Awad, was wounded in the clash. I know, a 9th-grader is plenty old enough to aim and fire an AK-47. Still, it looks bad, and in this situation, appearance matter as much--or more--than truth. Al Jazeera and other worldwide media outlets are running with the graphic footage of wounded and dead Iraqis and the incident is inflaming already virulent anti-American sentiments throughout the Arab world.

This story illustrates perfectly what people opposed to this war feared beforehand. We never doubted that the might of the U.S. military would easily roll over Iraqi defenders. That was a foregone conclusion. What we worried about was the aftermath.

The U.S. grunt on the ground in Iraq, now in charge of traffic control, aid distribution, restoration of utilities and services, maintenance of civil order, etc. does not speak Arabic, doesn't have the first clue about Iraqi culture, mores, or religious, ethnic and gender divisions--and doesn't care to! He most likely thinks all Moslems are terrorists and blames them for 9/11. Armed-to-the-teeth and trained to kill, these soldiers are unfit to control the civilian administration of an embittered nation, particularly while the vast majority of the rest of the world looks on, willing the U.S. to fail.

Inevitability, no matter what we do--even if, as will eventually occur, it is justified in the name of the self-defense of beleaguered and outnumbered American soldiers--will be misconstrued and used as propaganda against us.

Moreover, in this era--and especially in this part of the world--propaganda against us often leads to, god forbid, more attempted 9/11's.

Full story here.

28 April 2003


Thomas Hurndall and American hate....

I reported on 4/11/03 that British peace activist, Thomas Hurndall, had been shot in the back of the head by an Israeli Defense Forces sniper while snatching two children out of harm's way in the southern Gaza Strip.

According to this story in the Christian Science Monitor, Hurndall still lingers on in a deep coma some 2-1/2 weeks later. How tragically sad for his family and loved-ones....

The CSM article profiles the nonviolent peace movement in Palestine and Israel, making the point that it has been far too easy to overlook the long history of nonviolence in the region. To be honest, I never knew such a history existed--and I've lived in Israel.
The collapse of the peace process demoralized the Israeli left, but its members still organize actions. Israeli and foreign activists often accompany Palestinians during olive harvests to protect them from attacks by Israeli settlers.

Palestinian peaceful resistance began on a large scale in 1967 with strikes and boycotts against Israel, which had just seized the territories. It may have culminated in the first months of the Palestinian uprising of 1978 to 1993, with widespread nonviolent resistance to Israel's occupation.

One shocking mention in the story involves Rachel Corrie, the young American killed by a bulldozer in March while demonstrating with The International Solidarity Movement (ISM) in Palestine. ISM's mission is to support Palestinian nonviolent resistance by working with Palestinians who otherwise would face "harsh punishment from Israeli forces."

Apparently, the organization has been inundated with a torrent of hate mail in the wake of Corrie's death.

How heartwarming. Once again, the Far Right demonstrates its much heralded "compassionate conservatism."

In the aftermath of every high-profile hate-crime in this country--the murders of transgendered teen, Gwen Araujo, in the S.F. Bay Area; African-American, James Byrd,Jr., in Jasper, Texas; and gay college student, Matthew Shepard, in Wyoming, to name a few--the cockroaches crawl out of the wall and brave the light of day.

Think I'm exaggerating the level of their vitriol? Then check out Fred Phelps' "God Hates Fags" site, where the infamous Baptist preacher of hate catalogs Matthew Shepard's days in Hell. With the proper plugins, you can even run your mouse over Matthew's photo in the dancing flames and hear him scream.

I kid you not. It is vile. And it has been up on the Web for years.

And they dare to call us sinful?

And the gravy train rolls on....

Oxfam has expressed outrage over the man the Bush junta has put in charge of agricultural reconstruction in Iraq. From the Guardian/UK:
Dan Amstutz is a former senior executive of Cargill, the biggest grain exporter in the world, and served in the Reagan administration as a trade negotiator in the Uruguay round of world trade talks.

Oxfam is concerned that his involvement is an example of the potentially damaging commercialization of the reconstruction effort in Iraq, which it would prefer to see conducted under the auspices of the United Nations.

Kevin Watkins, Oxfam's policy director, said Mr Amstutz would "arrive with a suitcase full of open-market rhetoric", and was more likely to try to dump cheap US grain on the potentially lucrative Iraqi market than encourage the country to rebuild its once-successful agricultural sector.

"Putting Dan Amstutz in charge of agricultural reconstruction in Iraq is like putting Saddam Hussein in the chair of a human rights commission," Mr Watkins said.

Oxfam is worried that Amstutz will advance the commercial interests of American grain companies by busting open the Iraqi market, and leave the Iraqi agricultural sector unprotected from cutthroat US competition at the crucial early stages of its reconstruction.

Full story here, via Common Dreams.

Surprise...!

Jump, now! Come on, jump through the hoops!

I honestly can't believe the media is still all over these stories of chemical weapons in Iraq. In this one, detailing the capture of Iraqi arms monitor, Hussam Mohammed Amin, the L.A. Times repeated U.S. military hopes--uh, claims--about the latest "find."
U.S. Special Forces operating near the northern Iraqi town of Baiji late last week found more than a dozen 55-gallon drums full of chemicals and two mobile chemical labs in a field surrounded by surface-to-air missiles.

The 10th Cavalry Regiment was called in, and preliminary tests showed the presence of cyclosarin, a nerve agent, as well as a blister agent that may be mustard gas, military officials said.

U.S. Navy Lt. Cmdr. Charles Owens, a spokesman with the U.S. Central Command in Qatar, said that only field tests had been done and laboratory tests would be needed to make a final determination.

Some past chemical finds have turned out to be pesticides. But coalition forces are hoping Amin will help lead them to the so far elusive weapons that were one of the major stated reasons for attacking Iraq on March 20. [Emphasis mine.]

I'll bet they are!

When I read the story, I yawned and thought, What'll be this time? Creosote? Raid? Cleaning fluid?

Not far off. According to the AP, the substance turned out to be rocket fuel.
BAIJI, Iraq (AP) - A metal drum found in northern Iraq that initially tested positive for nerve and blister agents might instead contain rocket fuel, according to new tests, a U.S. chemical weapons expert said Monday.

Give it up, Bush! Or go out there and plant some evidence of your own....

AP story here. (Thanks, MyWay.)

A little html knowledge, is a dangerous thing....

Hope I haven't rendered y'all color-blind by playing with these different hues...I'm almost done, so bear with me! Then I'll get back to the "real meat" of this blog, the commentary. (Ugh, what a metaphor for a vegetarian to employ!)

Happy birthday to you, hap....

Yep, it's Papa Hussein's birthday! He's 66--that is, if he's alive. I haven't heard any triumphant proclamations to the contrary from on high, so I assume it's likely.

I, for one, hope he is. I don't wish a horrible death at the business end of one of our bunker-busters on anyone, not even a truly evil dictator.

I'd rather see him dragged kicking and screaming before the World Court, to stand trial for his atrocities. Taking out leaders of sovereign nations via air-strike is a practice I repudiate on principle.

As far as celebrations go, I imagine he's had better....

SARS success story....

The World Health Organization announced today that Vietnam has become the first nation to contain SARS. The country's success in registering no new outbreaks in 20 days--twice the illness' incubation period--has been credited to actions of WHO doctor Carlo Urbani. Based in Vietnam, Urbani quickly recognized the disease's virulence and urged swift-acting health officials to initiate comprehensive quarantine measures as soon as the first cases appeared. Tragically, Urbani died of SARS on March 29, at age 46. (See Krieg9 4/10/03)

In the meantime, Hong Kong and China, both hard hit by the disease, are scrambling to prevent its spread. Travelers leaving from Hong Kong's international airport are being subjected to body temperature checks (!) and anyone with a fever is being kept off the planes. (A lot fewer colds are being spread, too, I'd wager....)

In China, meantime, officials have moved to close movie theaters, discos, and karaoke parlors and workers are laboring to construct a 1,000-bed "field hospital" outside Beijing to isolate patients.

Full story here.

27 April 2003


Talk back....

I've just spent the last several hours taxing the limits of my patience, html skills and the capabilities of my ancient Powerbook 2400c's 180MHz processor making format changes to this site, the biggest of which is a link that will--hopefully-- appear in all posts from now on, transforming this into a 2 (or-more) way dialog.

Now, the rest is up to you.

26 April 2003


Casualties of a war at home....

So, I wondered before I started out this morning, what are junkies like?

I should have known better. I've been over at R's when somebody's come looking to exchange used needles. Although he doesn't encourage junkies to show up at his house in an upscale San Diego neighborhood, R permits a few to drop by if they're in desperate need, the ones he's gotten to know over the 12 years he's performed needle-exchange and who are now almost friends.

Someone R knows wrote the grants and got the technically-illegal program off the ground. Politicians and law-enforcement officials who stumble across it tend to look the other way, and media attention has been focused elsewhere, on a new, officially-sanctioned program which has been making tentative baby steps and takes pains to distance itself from R's group.

A shame, considering the invaluable experience they've garnered during more than 12 years ministering to hundreds (thousands?) of addicts, providing them with clean needles, alcohol swabs, antibiotic ointment and other harm-reduction materials, thereby prolonging lives and preventing the spread of a host of blood-born illnesses to non-drug users.

Formerly once-a-week, now every other week, R or another volunteer drives the 4 to 5-hour route, stopping at designated homes. People know he's coming, news of the service spreads by word-of-mouth, and many junkies help out addicted friends, collecting and exchanging full sharps-containers for empties and requesting extra clean needles and syringes to hand out.

Nothing remarkable distinguishes the people I've previously encountered at R's, so much so that I've given up trying to figure out who is a volunteer, who a junkie and who just a friend when a new face appears at the door. Until they go back to the garage and the exchange occurs, I simply don't know.

Today was different, however, we were going to their homes, and a trend quickly became apparent. These are people who have seen better times. Harshly used by life, they have been rendered as worn and threadbare as the scuffed wall-to-wall carpet that invariably covered the floors of their tiny, shuttered and darkened homes.

The houses, sometimes ramshackle on the outside, were surprisingly neat and clean inside. Cheaply turned out with battered furnishings and sometimes cluttered, they were vacuumed and dusted and I never saw a single dirty dish in a sink.

Better times were evidenced, though, by framed photographs on walls and side-tables. In one, a young man in military uniform stared seriously at the camera. In several, young adults posed proudly in caps-and-gowns--children? Or the addicts themselves? I saw the occasional wedding picture, solemn or smiling, and framed slogans celebrating Black pride. In one apartment, a collection of framed rock-band playbills decorated two walls. I saw fresh fruit and delivered bottled water in several homes--suggestions of healthier habits, perhaps formed during happier days.

The junkies defied categories. They were white, black and brown--the latter a reflection of the U.S.A.-Mexico border just miles away--male and female, mostly middle-aged to older. Although determining a junkie's age is pure guesswork: poverty and addiction ravage a person's looks.

No matter how humble their circumstances, though, or compromised their health, people were polite and gracious. They asked after R's wife and toddler. Shook my hand and made sure they ended by saying how glad they were to have met me. And always, they thanked us profusely.

"They're so used to nobody caring," R said, "they're just grateful we come by."

Truly, the encounters had the quality of social visits. People often seemed as grateful for the effort R made to seek them out and interact with them--knowing they were junkies--as for the supplies he provided.

It didn't take too many homes before I found myself wondering if I wasn't witnessing the graphic results of 30 years of economic warfare against America's working classes. Yes, I know, they're junkies, addicted to physically-disabling (and illegal) substances--sometimes to the point of not being able to hold down jobs. But what jobs are available? Do any come with a living wage and benefits?

How different would these folks' circumstances look had they money in the bank and, say, guaranteed health and dental-care? Don't tell me the face of addiction is not determined by economics. I'll come back at you with Dennis Hopper, Drew Barrymore, Matthew Perry and Robert Downey, Jr.

The people we saw today aren't even enjoying their addiction. "They don't talk about getting high anymore," R told me. "They talk about getting well." They inject drugs regularly just to keep at bay heroin's devastating withdrawal symptoms.

All made an impression, of one sort or another.

First was a bone-thin, older black woman, whose tiny, low-to-the-ground pink-stucco bungalow could barely contain all her cheap furniture and belongings. She had forgotten we were coming. Still attired in a nightgown at 11:30, she swayed on her feet, teetering to one side like her cottage, and her hands shook as she handed over used needles and accepted clean ones.

"She has congenital heart failure," R told me once we were back in the car. "That never gets better, you know, it just keeps getting worse." Turns out, she was the woman I'd heard about for years, who looked out after the neighborhood's derelicts, suffering the wrath of the cops for it, frequent visitors to her bungalow.

Then there was the short, stocky, 40-something black man, whose belly hung out from under his T-shirt and over the waistband of his camouflage fatigues. His teeth were rotted completely away, when he smiled shyly, a few yellow stumps poked up. He gave us a twenty as a voluntary donation.

Next we saw a long-haired, large-breasted and slightly chubby prostitute. White and in her 30's, she lived in a small, cluttered trailer that had seen its last vacation, in a park replete with faded, crumbling, no-longer-mobile homes.

While a male acquaintance lounged on the unmade bed and surfed the Internet for porn, she quietly rummaged for her used needles, thanked us in a soft voice for coming and followed us outside to lock the gate as we left. Gesturing toward her coddled, well-groomed chow who lounged in the shade, "She keeps her eyes glued to the gate, never missing a chance to escape," the woman flashed us a sweet smile that dropped decades from her face.

One guy was a newbie. A rangy, weather-worn white man in his late 30's, he was working on an orange BMW in his driveway with a bare-chested, gray-bearded tattooed man when we drove up. He led us into the house, down a pitch dark hallway where he flipped on a light and opened a combination lock that secured a bedroom door. Tossing out the cat who tried to sneak in behind us, he closed the door and stood shyly in his T-shirt and Levis, fingers hooked into a belt with a large, Western buckle.

R asked how many clean needles he and his girlfriend would need. "Ahhh....fourteen?" he replied, shuffling his feet on the carpet. Then his eyes widened like a schoolboy at a comic-book convention as R scooped out a couple brimming handfuls of needles and syringes, placing the pile of sterilely sealed packages on the neatly-made bed.

"There are two of you, right?" R asked. "And it'll be two weeks 'til we're back. So take enough and only use each one once."

Toward the end, we saw a bubbling Latina, who rushed out and exchanged with us out of the trunk of her car in the parking lot of Marie Callender's, attired in her waitress' uniform. Then a slightly older woman who lives in a nice track home with her sister and aged mother. She delighted in her pet Chihuahua, excited by our arrival. "He doesn't usually like men," she said. She'd rescued the dog as a stray, battered and spitting up blood, and nursed him back to health.

The last guy we visited for the day was a Mexican-American man of indeterminate age, thin and lanky, with large, expressive hands. He almost seemed starved for contact, more interested in engaging us in conversation than in getting supplies. We made the exchange beside the car, parked in a dirt alleyway next to his house, under the constant watch of a loud group of neighbors across the street.

The man drew out the encounter, slowly transferring used needles into the proffered sharps-container, bent over the ground in front of the car and concealing his actions by placing everything within a large brown paper bag. He exchanged that bag for a new bag, containing clean needles and an empty sharps-container. All the while, he talked to R. How was the baby? What was new? Was this our last call for the day? He didn't seem to want to let us go.

As we drove toward home, I asked R about the scabs covering the man's hands. "He's collapsed all his veins," R said. "So he only skin-pops now." A particularly risky practice, R added, as infections are easy to catch and spread that way. Yet the man persistently refuses R's offers of antibiotic ointment.

"Junkies just don't take care of themselves," R said, sighing. "They've been told for so long that they don't deserve it, they've come to believe it."

Clean needles for junkies....

I'm off this morning to accompany one of my best friends as he does the weekly run on San Diego's underground needle-exchange program. More later....

Almost forgot: Ann Garrels....

NPR announced this past week that reporter Ann Garrels had returned to the U.S. from Baghdad--safe and sound, much to the relief of her family and loved-ones. Garrels, 52, said she had noticeably less stamina than her mostly younger media colleagues on the ground in Iraq, and that this would be the last war she would choose to cover. Welcome home...!

25 April 2003


Why the silence...?

My favorite blogs (listed on this site) have been curiously silent to date on SARS, and I'm wondering why.

For my case, I've been reluctant to contribute to the gradual but steady buildup of hysteria, as the mainstream media beast turns its lumbering head from contemplating the war in Iraq to focusing on the mysterious illness.

At the same time, several facts concern me.

First, the scientific community has announced various SARS "breakthroughs," only to subsequently backpedal furiously when new cases and evidence fail to corroborate their original theories.

For example, health officials have been unable to detect the virus thought to cause SARS in a high percentage of the most recent fatalities.

Also, after touting that countries with well-established, modern public-health systems seem capable of containing outbreaks--allowing citizens in "developed nations" to breathe a sigh of relief and dismiss the illness as a "third world" problem-- the World Health Organization this week issued a health advisory against unnecessary travel to Toronto--provoking an emotional firestorm from Toronto Mayor Mel Lastman (unfortunate name, considering) and Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien. They and others are furiously lobbying WHO to reverse, or at least tone-down, the advisory, hoping to salvage mega tourist dollars hanging in the balance--a lost cause at this point, I'd wager.

More troubling, a N.Y. Times article on Tuesday states that the SARS death rate, while low, is climbing, rather than decreasing as typically occurs over time:
But as the number of cases has increased — to 3,861 yesterday — the death rate has also steadily risen, leaving health officials worried. Lacking a precise explanation for the rise, health officials have generated a number of theories.....

[...]

One theory for the rising SARS death rate is that the initial cases involved health care workers who were healthy 20-to-45-year-old adults and who had better access to health care than others. Then, as the infected health workers unintentionally spread the disease to family members and friends, and they, in turn, to others, SARS has infected an increasing number of older people with heart disease, diabetes and other chronic ailments.

A second theory is that many of the SARS deaths occurred among patients who became ill weeks ago but who died only recently, after extended hospital stays.

Still another, and more disputed, theory is that the SARS virus, a newly discovered member of the coronavirus family, has become more virulent as it infected new generations of cases....

[...]

If the death-rate trend continues, SARS will be unlike the first outbreaks of other newly discovered microbes where the initially high death rate substantially declined as the development of diagnostic tests and further epidemiologic investigation documented the existence of mild, even asymptomatic, cases.

A confusion among health experts over the cause SARS is most troubling.

On Saturday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta posted on its Web site (www.cdc.gov) an advisory to doctors caring for SARS patients, saying the cause of the disease was unknown. The update came days after the W.H.O. had announced that the coronavirus was the cause of SARS and created some confusion as to whether the Americans and the W.H.O. disagreed on the matter. Although a C.D.C. spokesman said yesterday that the update was in error and would be corrected, the Saturday version remained on the Web site last [Monday] night.

And it is still there.

I sincerely want to be overreacting here. But I can't help flashing back to the early, early days of HIV. I was living in San Francisco and heard the first word-of-mouth rumors about a strange illness that was killing gay men. Granted, we are far from as naive now as then, in large part due to the AIDS epidemic. But the "fortunate" characteristic about HIV--and I use the word loosely, having lost far too many friends and acquaintances to AIDS--is that the virus is extremely hard to transmit. SARS, on the other hand, can be spread casually, from one person to another, by sharing an elevator or breathing the same air in a hallway.

According to the N.Y. Times, the current 5.6% death rate is much higher than the less than 1% rate for the influenza pandemic of 1918-19, which killed 20 million to 40 million people worldwide because it spread so quickly.

Entire story here.

Another way to accomplish regime change....

Impeach their asses...! The following great idea is from yesterday's dailyKOS.
We invaded Iraq SOLELY on the basis of its supposed WMD program. We damaged international institutions such as the UN and NATO. We wounded our relationships with several of our closest allies and Russia, spurring talk of global coalitions against US hegemony. We spent an $80 billion on the war and first 6 months of occupation, more to come later. We suffered over 600 dead and wounded. We killed untold thousands.

[...]

If in six months no such weapons are found, then start impeachment proceedings.

This war has been too costly, in both treasure and human life. To have based the war on nothing more than rumor is gross incompetence. Our country deserves better.

Remember that this was never about "freedom". The presence of Eritria, Uzbekistan, Georgia and Ethopia in our "Coalition of the Willing" proves that. It was about WMDs.

If we don't find them, the costs were all for naught, and Bush should pay the price.

Of course now, according to today's KOS, administration officials are spinning that they overstated the thread of Iraqi WMDs and invaded Iraq simply to "make a point." If Clinton can suffer impeachment proceedings for lying about a blowjob in the White House, how much more so should Bush for the travesty of bringing about this war through a campaign of willful misinformation and lies?!

Regime change in the U.S.A...!

MoveOn.org is starting a campaign to defeat Bush and the Republicans in 2004.

Sign up here.

As MoveOn points out, the Republicans are already gearing up for the campaign. Progressives need to get organized! MoveOn now has 1.3 million members. If you're not one of them, JOIN NOW. It's fast, it's easy. And grassroots action is the only way we're going to wrest control of the government from the hands of the oligarchy....

24 April 2003


U.S. warns Iraqis....

BAGHDAD, Iraq, April 23 — The American military moved today to strip Baghdad's self-appointed administrator of his authority and warned Iraqi factions not to take advantage of the confusion and the political void in the country by trying to grab power.

Lt. Gen. David McKiernan, the commander of ground forces in Iraq, issued a proclamation putting Iraq's politicians on notice, saying, "The coalition alone retains absolute authority within Iraq." He warned that anyone challenging the American-led authority would be subject to arrest.

Ooooh! I'll bet that really scares them!

Just what are we going to threaten to do if Iraqis don't behave? Starve them into submission? Cut off all power, water and food? Destroy their hospitals? Mow them down by the hundreds with our superior firepower, then bomb their cities to smithereens?

Uh-huh. Been there, done that and the natives are still gettin' uppity.
...Among those engaged in the rush for power were two longtime Iraqi exiles. American concern over the activities of these two men — Muhammad Mohsen Zobeidi and Ahmad Chalabi — has begun to grow, military officials said.

Wasn't Chalabi Bush's golden boy? ...How quickly the milk sours under the hot, Iraqi sun.

Zobeidi, whose qualifications for running Baghdad include participation in a "disaster control management course" arranged by the State Department--now there's a phrase that could describe Bush's reign in general--asserts that he was chosen to lead an executive council charged with administering Baghdad. He has allegedly moved to appoint a police chief, ignoring the police official installed by the Army's Third Infantry Division, while his supporters have been busy "appropriating" government vehicles.

Later, the article addresses the administration's about-face on Mr. Chalabi.
Some Bush administration officials, however, have been skeptical that Mr. Chalabi, who spent the past few decades in exile, would attract much of a following in iraq.[sic] And allied military officials have been concerned that Mr. Chalabi's men are throwing their weight around to build a political base for their leader.

Mr. Chalabi has about 700 fighters in his entourage who were flown to the Iraqi air base at Tallil several weeks ago by the American military at the request of Pentagon officials. American forces then scoured the country for arms and ammunition to equip the fighters so that they could participate in the campaign to oust Mr. Hussein.[Emphasis mine.]


American officials are now worried that some these men are being reorganized as a private security force for Mr. Chalabi and suspect they have been setting up their own checkpoints and even --gasp!-- detaining Iraqis.

Thus, mere weeks after establishing Mr. Chalabi's force, allied commanders are now planning to either demobilize it or place it formally under allied command. (Good luck!)

Up to now, we're lockstep with the familiar plan: appoint the puppet, uh, leader, set him up, arm him to the teeth, then sit back and wait. Until one day we realize--Ooops, we've created a monster! Then take him out. Although our reaction-time seems to be lightning quick in this instance.

Complete story here.

23 April 2003


An alternative to....

I designed a business card today and, first draft, came up with a motto, "Blogging...an alternative to civil disobedience."

As I proceeded to write that phrase here, however, inspiration struck. Blogging, an alternative not to civil disobedience, but to jail-time. That's much closer to the truth.

I started to blog after making a decision to participate in civil disobedience against this second Iraq war. When I ran the idea of getting arrested by family and friends, though, not one of them was in favor. No surprise there: a transgendered person faces special risks in jail.

Enter blogging. I've been a fan for some time--Tom Tomorrow's fault. Not only that, since I graduated from journalism school, I've known that editorials and opinion pieces are my true loves. So, blogging it was, rather than jail.

But...blogging--putting what are in essence first drafts out there for public criticism--carries its own risks. Enter another inspiration, Arianna Huffington.

I remember when she first surfaced in the op-ed pages. "You ought to check her out," my father insisted, but I was a hard one to convince. How could this diva of the Far Right, ex-wife to failed Californian Republican Senate candidate, Michael Huffington, have anything to say that I'd want to read?

My first exposure was by accident. I found myself drawn in by an op-ed piece in the pages of the L.A. Times. I can't remember the topic--SUVs, cuts in education funding, corporate greed, something.... I read it all the way through and was thinking Right on! when I looked up at the author's name. Arianna Huffington? No way!

After that, I began watching for her name, regularly reading her columns--almost surreptitiously. Months went by and never encountering an opinion piece I didn't like, I had to admit: this woman could write and her keen wit and biting criticism were on-target!

And speaking of risks! Huffington evolved from Republican vamp, darling of Newt Gingrich's Revolution, to one of the hardest-hitting, progressive political pundits in the nation--all while in the public eye. What an inspiration.

I met Huffington this evening. She spoke and signed copies of her new book, Pigs at the Trough, at a local, independent bookstore. It was standing-room-only, even in conservative San Diego! And Huffington did not disappoint. She is as articulate and courageous in person, as she is on the printed page. (Not so me. Tongue-tied, brain-dead and shuffling my feet, I pushed a book across for her to sign. Along with one of my first-draft business cards. She's a big fan of blogs, it seems.)

She bills herself an unflagging optimist, confident that the groundswell of progressivism sweeping the country, if given 6-9 months to grow, will transform the upcoming presidential election. "We do not want a repeat of the 2000 campaign!" she said, to loud audience approval.

She will never run for public office, she stated in response to a question from the audience. "Eighty percent of the time is spent raising money. You have to be some sort of psychotic to do that!" Moreover, once elected, the system corrupts even the most idealistic and well-meaning of candidates.

"We've got to change the system. And systems in this country," she said, citing the Civil Rights Movement and Feminism, "are not changed by politicians, but by mass movements." She added that there are now two super-powers in the world: the U.S. and organized popular movements.

I especially appreciated her definition of fanatics. "They're impervious to evidence," which perfectly describes Bush, Wolfowitz, Perle and the other self-anointed millennium crusaders.

"I'm in the Army now, I'm not behind the plough...."

Oh well, what do we need teachers for anyway? Just enlist those kids in the armed services! The next NPR story identified San Diego as the "largest military complex in the world." Wow.... I knew that aircraft carriers operating in the Persian Gulf were home-ported here. We have a busy naval airfield, just east of where I work. And then there's the huge Marine Corps base in the north county, conveniently situated alongside a nuclear power plant, its telltale dome less than a couple hundred meters off the main highway leading to Los Angeles.

Which puts us right up there with NYC as a likely terrorist target, wouldn't you say? Al Qaeda even knows San Diego, having located a couple of the 9/11 hijackers here as they prepared for the infamous attack.

But fear not: we're protected by the CIA, Homeland Security and the FBI!

Ahhh...the same FBI that locally placed an informant as a roommate to one of the 9/11 hijackers, but still failed to uncover the plot? That's the one!

Aren't you glad Bush waged war in Afghanistan and Iraq to make us all safer from terrorism?


The "bloodbath" begins at home....

NPR also announced this morning that 400 jobs will be cut from the San Diego School District to recoup $52 million of an expected $148 million shortfall. Sounds like most of those cut will be teachers. With many more to come....

Why...?

Tell me again, why did we invade Iraq? 9/11...Weapons of mass destruction...Liberate the people from the horrible dictator. Yeah, yeah. Anything but oil. Well, NPR reported this morning that Baghdad is still without power, water and security, yet the oil is flowing once again from the Iraqi fields.

Actions speak lounder than words.

22 April 2003


He won't take No for an answer....

Unless his brother says it....
WASHINGTON — Blocked by stiff congressional opposition to opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, the Bush administration is moving on its own to promote energy exploration in the icy waters off Alaska.

Government officials are inviting oil companies to bid later this year on the rights to drill in the Beaufort Sea off northern Alaska, an area unaffected by a moratorium on new offshore exploration in much of the rest of the country.

[...]

The Alaskan coast may be one of the best hopes left to President Bush to achieve his goal of developing more domestic energy production.

In response to objections from his brother, Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, the president reduced drilling opportunities in the Gulf of Mexico, and agreed to spend $235 million to cancel unused oil and gas leases elsewhere off Florida's coast and in the Everglades.

Add to that $235 million cancelation penalty, millions of dollars' worth of incentives to encourage bids on the high-risk Alaskan leases.

Yay! Another tax-payer debacle. Bush sells-out, we shell-out!

Complete story here, via Common Dreams.

Drink up...!

But not that cuppa joe....
WASHINGTON, April 21 (AP) —Tea increases the body's defenses against infection and contains a substance that may be turned into a drug to protect against disease, a study has found. Coffee does not have the same effect, the researchers say in an article today in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

A component in tea primes the immune system to attack invading bacteria, viruses and fungi, the study concluded.

An experiment showed that immune system blood cells of tea drinkers responded five times faster to germs than did the blood cells of coffee drinkers.

Darn! When are they going to discover something healthy about coffee?
Full story here.

Get one while you can...!

This in today's N.Y. Times:
ITALY: PIN-UP PRIESTS A calendar of handsome young priests posing in front of famous Rome landmarks has gone on sale. The priests are featured in "Calendario Romano 2004," intended to promote tourism in Rome. It is not affiliated with the Vatican, although January's picture, left, promotes St. Peter's Square. The black-and-white photographs were by Piero Pazzi. "I usually photograph gondoliers for Venetian calendars, but this time I wanted to do something Roman, and what better than priests?" he said. "The priests are young and good-looking, but that doesn't make them sex symbols. That depends on the imagination of the viewer." (Reuters)

Indeed it does...!

Let's give the photographer the benefit of the doubt that the priestly pedophile scandal, so unavoidable here, has yet to arouse widespread public condemnation in Italy. I still can't believe that the Vatican isn't going to come down on this calendar like a ton of moldy communion wafers.

As a lapsed Catholic, survivor of 5 years of Catholic grammar-school, I'd wager that otherwise, the calendar will sell better than papal dispensations at a bigamists' convention. All that Catholic guilt, you know.

It's not too late...!

Still nearly two hours left on the East Coast and a whopping five on the West Coast until Earth Day 2003 will be officially over in the U.S. of A. Go here and see what you can do to make a difference.

Or better yet, make every day Earth Day and change your life in big and little ways to tread a smaller footprint on our generous Mother. Ride your bike, sell your car. Become vegetarian. Recycle!

At the very least, as they say on the Earth Day Network site, Register to Vote! But only environmentalists....the rest of youse guys stay home on election day! (Can't imagine anyone out there still reading after all this time is anything but!)

Sobering....

This site has posted photos of many of the American soldiers who have lost their lives in Iraq (along with British and French casulties).

An image is worth a thousand words....

Bush vacation daze....

The front page of today's N.Y. Times print-edition shows President Bush, wife, Laura, and family dog, Barney, disembarking Air Force One in D.C. after yet another a trip to Texas. Now, the caption doesn't say Bush was on vacation, but it was Easter, after all, so I'm going to make a leap here and assume the royal couple were kicking back at The Ranch.

What I'd like to know is, how many vacation days does this guy get? Americans, if we're lucky enough to have a permanent job, average 13 vacation days a year. That's 13...! We trail by nearly half the legendary workaholic Japanese, who enjoy 25 days of annual vacation. Not to mention the Europeans! They get a month off every year, give or take a week.

Now I don't know, maybe I should be glad G.W. would rather hit the jogging trail than burn the midnight oil over some confusing, complicated and boring peace treaty between Palestinians and Israelis. His reign has wrecked enough global havoc with him on light-duty; Lord knows if the planet could survive a full-time Bush presidency!

But the issue here is also parity. If our head civil servant gets a 3 or 4-day every-other-weekend, well, we should, too! Or at least a month off every summer.

Time warp....

A photo on the cover of today's L.A. Times web-edition. (it's been pulled...) prompted a double or triple take this morning. From a low camera angle, it showed a mid-shot of a crowd of chanting, bearded Shiite men, each attired in what looked like homespun-cloth robes knotted at the waist with cord. Each man was drenched in blood, faces and clothing soaked red, from self-inflicted scimitar wounds. Several crescent-shaped blades were visible, held high above the crowd in bloodied hands.

The image could have been a scene from the Crusades--in the Middle Ages, that is, not our modern version.

Viola, the people G.W. has spent (officially, to date) $74.7 billion of our tax money to liberate. And now they want an Islamic theocracy.

I've been struck by the preponderance of males in the news photos snapped since the "liberation." Of all the Islamic countries in the Middle East, Iraq had one of the most open societies for women. I suspect that is going to change.

21 April 2003


Blog break....

I took a break to attend to other concerns. But I'm back! And, sadly, I find no shortage of troubling news to pique my righteous wrath.

Like this from today's L.A. Times:
PLAYA GRANDE, Costa Rica -- The leatherback sea turtle, the massive and mysterious reptile of the Pacific Ocean, has outlived the dinosaurs by 65 million years. It has survived fiery asteroid strikes and ice ages that chilled the globe.

But it doesn't look as if this prehistoric innocent will survive us.

Imagine...! And here's why:
Scientists, once focused on protecting turtle nests on shore, are shifting their attention to what they see as a greater menace: the drowning of turtles in fishing nets and on strings of baited hooks unfurled for 50 miles off the sterns of commercial long-line vessels.

Crowder [an oceanographer] calculates that long-line fishermen set 4.5 million hooks every night, stringing the ocean with the marine equivalent of 100,000 miles of barbed-wire fencing. [Emphasis mine.]

Are we crazy?!

These lines sound like the modern equivalent of driftnets, banned by the United Nations, the E.C., and, happily, the U.S.

Unfortunately, even driftnets continue to be deployed in the high seas and along the shores of the countries yet to ban them. Japan, Korea, Taiwan and the Republic of China are cited as repeat offenders. Driftnets, like the long-lines mentioned here, drown turtles, seabirds, dolphins, sharks, marlin and many other types of fish, many of which are then discarded.

I know I shouldn't be surprised at this, after all, look at the carnage we wrought against our own kind in Iraq. Still, the short-sightedness of these practices is utterly appalling.

The L.A. Times article ends by saying that we're pushing not only the turtles to extinction, we're depleting the entire Pacific Ocean, the world's largest ocean, something scientists once thought would be impossible.