22 July 2006


(From Middle East Online.

American complicity in war crimes....
WASHINGTON, July 21 — The Bush administration is rushing a delivery of precision-guided bombs to Israel, which requested the expedited shipment last week after beginning its air campaign against Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, American officials said Friday.

The decision to quickly ship the weapons to Israel was made with relatively little debate within the Bush administration, the officials said. Its disclosure threatens to anger Arab governments and others because of the appearance that the United States is actively aiding the Israeli bombing campaign in a way that could be compared to Iran’s efforts to arm and resupply Hezbollah.
The "appearance" that the United States is actively aiding the Israeli bombing campaign?

Say again?! The US is aiding the Israeli bombing campaign. Always has aided Israel in its wars against the Palestinians. And, I'm tempted to say based on the steadily rightward shift of US politics, always will. With weapons, tactical support, vetoes in the UN Security Council, diplomatic relations, PR, and billions of dollars in aid.

So, when the next strike occurs on American soil, will Bush and his supporters claim it's because the terrorists "hate freedom and democracy"?

I marched again today through Dublin's city centre in a demonstration organised by the Socialist Youth to "Stop the Bombing Now!" Our numbers were small but we were there, a sign that not everyone believes in going about with business as usual while innocent civilians are blown apart with American-made bombs and missiles, brutally losing their lives, limbs, livelihoods, homes, livestock, pets, books, EVERYTHING!

I am appalled that so many are standing by doing nothing as this travesty is carried out.

According to the rest of the pathetic story, Secretary of State Condie Rice is going to jet over to the region soon. She can't make unseemly haste, you see, as the Israelis need time to complete their slaughter.

I've lived in Israel. I believe in Israel's right to exist. But the horrific death and destruction the Jewish state is perpetrating in Lebanon and Gaza are nauseating in their utter lack of morality.

20 July 2006


Must read....

If only for the powerful analogy at the beginning:
The other day, a woman came up to me at a party and slapped me in the face simply because I had lied about her behavior in public, and maybe stole a little money from her dresser late one night. I had also started up with her best friend, and told her other friends that she was a lesbian.

Oh yeah, I kind of took her apartment in Malibu away from her and didn't give it back.

Anyway, I immediately pulled out my 38 and shot her on the spot.
Complete post at one of my favorite blogs, here.

(ISNA/Photo:MASHHAD)

Sad anniversary....

Yesterday marked the one-year anniversary of the brutal executions of two gay Iranian teenagers, Mahmoud Asgari and Ayaz Marhoni (above).

Their deaths are the predictable and tragic outcome of “Vice and Virtues” nonsense like that reported in my post yesterday. The two boys—and they were boys: while their reported ages varied, with them being allegedly as young as 14 and 16 at their arrests, no one disputes that they had not yet turned 20 by the time they were killed. The two boys were incarcerated and tortured for 14 months, then hanged, for allegedly raping a 13-year-old boy. This accusation has been universally disputed by all but the most hardened homophobes.

Their real crime was engaging in a long-term consensual sexual relationship with each other in a country governed by Sharia. One speaker at a rally to honour the boys that I attended in Dublin’s city centre yesterday evening, Irish Senator David Norris, said a family member likely turned the boys in to the “religious” police.

So much for “family values.”

As religious fundamentalism strengthens its hold in countries as diverse as the US, Russia, Poland, Nigeria, and throughout the Middle East, LGBT folks are increasingly coming under both metaphorical and all-too-real fire. Calls for a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage in the US, with the ensuing bashings and deaths such homophobic rhetoric fosters. Beheadings of gays in Saudi Arabia. Abductions, torture and murders of suspected gays in Iraq. Executions of gays by stoning in Nigeria. Police sanctioned beatings of demonstrators at a Gay Pride parade in Russia.

And this brutal hanging a year ago in Iran.

As speakers emphasised yesterday, this is not an LGBT issue, it’s a human rights issue.

Mahmoud Asgari and Ayaz Marhoni will be remembered.

19 July 2006


(Photo here.)


Vice and virtue in the Middle East....

Afghanistan has announced plans to re-establish its "Vice and Virtues Ministry," the infamous government body which under the Taliban was charged with enforcing bans on morally questionable activities like girls' schools, television, card-playing, kite-flying and women's public baths.

But don't worry! Despite the identical name, girls who'd like to read, women who'd prefer to bathe, fans of Tolo TV, poker enthusiasts, kite-lovers and others, such as gays who'd rather leave the closet behind and artists who believe in freedom of expression, all have nothing to fear.
Karim Rahimi, Karzai's spokesman, said Afghans should not be worried.

"The people were scared of the Vice and Virtues Ministry under the Taliban, but this new ministry won't be like the Taliban's," Rahimi said. "It will take into consideration moral and religious activities to help improve Afghan society."
Oh, that's reassuring. The ministry will help improve Afghan society.

Lord knows it could use some improving. Afghanistan under American occupation is a country where, in May of 2005, a popular but controversial female TV presenter, Shaima Rezayee, 24, was shot dead in her home, execution style, one bullet to the head.

Victim of a family “honour killing"? Or of a religious zealot who believed no woman should appear on TV, especially in semi-western style clothing? Is there even a distinction between those two, other than that the latter could be a stranger? Her killing left a fellow male television presenter cowering in the studio, afraid to go home and desperately seeking asylum outside the country.

So, presumably with this new ministry in operation, Rezayee would never have had the opportunity of appearing on TV. Instead, shut away in the backroom of some Kabul home, unbathed, illiterate, and married to a man 30 years her senior, she may have still been "alive."

Salon story (requires subscription or ad-viewing) here.

18 July 2006


(Thor Swift for The New York Times)

FTM scientist speaks out...!

Dr. Ben A. Barres, who has a degree in biology from M.I.T., a medical degree from Dartmouth, a doctorate in neurobiology from Harvard and teaches at Stanford (!) explodes some sexist myths in a courageous commentary in the journal, Nature, and in this short interview in the NYT.
...Q.What about the idea that men and women differ in ways that give men an advantage in science?

A. People are still arguing over whether there are cognitive differences between men and women. If they exist, it’s not clear they are innate, and if they are innate, it’s not clear they are relevant. They are subtle, and they may even benefit women.

But when you tell people about the studies documenting bias, if they are prejudiced, they just discount the evidence.

Q. How does this bias manifest itself?

A. It is very much harder for women to be successful, to get jobs, to get grants, especially big grants. And then, and this is a huge part of the problem, they don’t get the resources they need to be successful. Right now, what’s fundamentally missing and absolutely vital is that women get better child care support. This is such an obvious no-brainer. If you just do this with a small amount of resources, you could explode the number of women scientists.

[snip]

Q. Why didn’t you see these episodes as sexism?

A. Women who are really highly successful, they are just as bad as the men. They think if they can do it, anyone can do it. They don’t see that for every woman who makes it to the top there are 10 more who are passed over. And I am not making this up, that’s what the data show.

And it may be that some women — and African-Americans, too — identify less strongly with their particular group. From the time I was a child, from the littlest, littlest age, I did not identify as a girl. It never occurred to me that I could not be a scientist because I was a woman. It just rolled off my back.

Now I wonder, maybe I just didn’t take these stereotypes so seriously because I did not identify myself as a woman.
I am so impressed with Dr. Barres' courage.

For one thing, he is outing himself (with photo!) in one of the most public forums possible: the pages of the New York Times.

When I was shortly out of journalism school, I went for advice to one of my former professors. A letter I'd submitted to the editor of the NYT in which I'd identified myself as FTM had been accepted for publication, but their editorial policy reasonably demanded I use my name. My professor, a former NYT reporter herself, advised that I assume everyone I knew would read the letter. If I wasn't prepared to out myself to everyone, then best not go forward.

I wasn't. My teenaged daughter lived with me at the time and attended a local high school and I worried about the possible consequences to her. So I pulled the letter.

Dr. Barres, on the other hand, is bravely going forward.

I am sure he knows better than anyone just how conservative--and sexist--the scientific and academic worlds are. From this point on, he will be widely known as the "transsexual scientist." His opinions and work will be taken less seriously by many. Future grant applications could be affected. And I sincerely hope he already has tenure at Stanford, for notoriety like this could hurt his chances.

I so admire that he felt strongly enough about women and feminism to take this brave stand.

Nature editor's summary is here. (The commentary itself must be purchased.)

And the NYT's interview here.

[Typo corrected 15:47 18/7/06.]

16 July 2006


Next target: Iran...?

On Irish radio this morning comes the alarming news that at least eight Israelis have been killed in Haifa (Israel's third largest city) by a Hezbollah missile strike. In response Israel is accusing Syria and Iran of culpability and threatening further vengeance. Meanwhile, the US government and Tony Blair keep reiterating "Israel's right to defend itself." President Bush was on Irish radio this morning from St. Petersburg, accusing Iran and Syria of supporting terrorism.

This disturbing rhetoric is truly frightening, especially in light of the assertion here that the current hostilities between Israel and Lebanon started with a deliberate provocation by Israel. [Hat tip to Shakespeare's Sister.]

If Israel really did entice Hezbollah to kidnap Israeli soldiers by deliberately placing them in harm's way, it's hard not to conclude that Israel's goal all along has been to create an incident to provide an excuse to invade Lebanon. The massive scope, rapidity and coordination of Israel's operation certainly lends credence to this theory. As does their destruction of the Beirut airport, bridges, roadways, a lighthouse, apartment complexes and other civilian targets.

So, if this is true, what to make of the escalating Israeli rhetoric?

Go back in time several months. When President Bush recently began (again) characterising Iran as an imminent threat to US security, using almost the exact rhetoric his regime employed in the lead up to the Iraq invasion, I began bracing myself for a US air invasion of Iran. (The US does not currently possess the ground troops to invade Iran by land.) Worse, given Seymour Hersh's reporting in The New Yorker, I’ve been terrified of a nuclear air war.

Facing mid-term Congressional elections in November in which they might lose control of at least one branch of the legislature, along with widespread and growing American opposition to the war in Iraq, it’s highly unlikely that Republicans would invade Iran without “serious provocation.” For this reason, among others, I’ve been bracing myself for “another 9/11.”

A second scenario, however, has always been that Israel would take the lead on an Iranian invasion by bombing selected targets in Iran, using the excuse that their own security was threatened, provoking an Iranian military response against Israel which would then “cause” America (and Great Britain) to jump in to defend their ally.

The second scenario may be unfolding before our eyes in this very moment.

I am seriously freaking out at this prospect.

The potential loss of life in the hundreds of thousands and the human suffering is horrific to contemplate.

As a friend of mine says, the human capacity for destruction and cruelty is heartbreaking, especially in light of the potential for beauty and love.

15 July 2006


The face of America abroad....

Ann Coulter was interviewed on Dublin’s Talk Radio 106 “Wide Angle” show this morning by one of my favorite journalists, Karen Coleman (not related to RTE's Carole Coleman who held Bush’s feet to the fire in a legendary 2004 TV interview).

Unfortunately, this morning’s interview was recorded which meant that callers, like me, couldn't suggest questions. But Karen didn't do too badly. She challenged Coulter more than gutless American journalists. And Coulter, as batshit insane as ever, came off sounding—especially to a more informed Irish audience--as culturally chauvinistic, historically uninformed, religiously fanatical, uncharitable, foolhardy and rude. In other words, par for the course.

I did manage to get a comment read on air, as coming from an "American caller" which basically said that Coulter isn't widely supported in America but instead is regarded as an extremist and apologist for the American fundamentalist right-wing fascist fringe.

Not exactly what I said, but close enough!

Applying logic to the Middle East....

This excellent article in Salon (requires subscription or ad-viewing) articulately states what I've been trying to say since September 11, 2001 (and before): the situation in the Middle East will only be worsened by the US and Israel applying violence. The past three years' events support this conclusion.
...The Lebanese and Palestinians have responded to Israel's persistent and increasingly savage attacks against entire civilian populations by creating parallel or alternative leaderships that can protect them and deliver essential services. With every new Israeli attack against the Hamas and Hezbollah leadership or the civilian populations, four important things happen, and will probably happen during this round of war: The Lebanese and Palestinian governments lose power and impact; Hamas and Hezbollah garner greater popular support, which enhances their effectiveness in guerrilla and resistance warfare; they expand their military technical capabilities (mainly longer-range missiles and better improvised explosive devices); and the anti-Israel, anti-U.S. resistance campaign led by Hamas and Hezbollah generates widespread political and popular support throughout the Middle East and much of the world.

[snip]

The fourth pair of actors, the United States and Israel, find themselves in the bizarre position of repeating policies that have consistently failed for the past 40 years. Israel has this to show for its track record of being tough: It is now surrounded by two robust Islamist resistance movements with greater striking power and popular support; Arab populations around the region that increasingly vote for Islamist political movements whenever elections are held; immobilized and virtually irrelevant Arab governments in many nearby lands; and determined, increasingly defiant, ideological foes in Tehran and Damascus who do not hesitate to use all weapons at their means however damaging these may be to civilians and sovereignty in Lebanon and Palestine. [emphasis mine]

The United States for its part is strangely marginal. Its chosen policies have lined it up squarely with Israel. It has sanctioned and thus cannot even talk to Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas, and it has pressured and threatened Syria for years without any real success. The world's sole superpower is peculiarly powerless in the current crisis in the Middle East.

As long as these four pairs of main actors [Hamas and Hezbollah; the Palestinian and Lebanese governments; Syria and Iran; and Israel and the United States] persist in their intemperate policies, the consequences will remain grim. The way to break this cycle is for all actors to negotiate a political solution that responds to their legitimate grievances and demands. Everyone involved seems prepared to do this, except for Israel and the United States, who rely on military force, prolonged occupations, and diplomatic sanctions and threats. What will Israel and the United States do when there are no more Arab airports, bridges and power stations to destroy? The futility of such policies should be clear by now, and therefore a diplomatic solution should be sought seriously for the first time.
Read the full piece here.

14 July 2006


Magic of work....

With low unemployment and Ireland’s “Celtic Tiger,” it took me only two months to find a permanent job in Dublin. What’s more, the temp assignments that sustained me until then were far pleasanter than any I found in New York. That includes my five-month stint at ABC-Disney in Manhattan which, glamorous as it sounds, translated into enduring 21 weeks and three days of insults and temper tantrums at the hands of two spoiled producers of children’s programming. Magic kingdom indeed.

My other New York temp job was assistant to a senior VP of international branding. I came aboard Weider Publications just after the family-owned business sold out to a conglomerate, at a time when my boss was secretly organizing her department’s downsizing. Weeks of preparation culminated in a Monday morning bloodbath in which unsuspecting employees came to work only to be laid off before lunch and shown the door by security guards. Travel mugs sat, coffee going cold, on desks that would never again see their occupants. Wednesday, my boss was stunned to receive her own pink slip and I spent my final days there packing company freebies, pricey knick-knacks and expensive “product samples” for her to spirit away.

Improving upon those shining examples of neoliberalism was easy. My first Irish temp assignment was routine admin-support for Boots pharmacy and while their computer hardware was antiquated, software ancient and Internet connection dial-up, they were friendly, appreciative and a pleasure to work for.

Next came the mailroom of a Dutch investment company, where I made the acquaintance of the laziest person I’ve ever met. Scottish (just an observation, no reflection on Scotland!) and twenty-something, your man lived 15 minutes’ walk from work yet didn’t arrive on time once in six days. Forty-five minutes late, the first words out of his mouth would be, in his heavy brogue which I can't begin to recreate here, “Three buses went by without stopping!” Or, “Fell asleep on the bus and missed my stop!”

This hapless victim of a global conspiracy to make him late would then hand me half the work and head out to purchase a sticky bun. After eating breakfast while checking his email, he’d begin his daily routine of telephone calls to friends and cigarette breaks. By lunchtime, he’d have given me the other half of the work and as new work came in, he gave it to me without a pretense of taking half. He surfed the net, gossiped, fetched free Cokes from the canteen and disappeared, reeking of cigarettes on his return, while I stuffed envelopes, franked letters and logged courier packages. When half five rolled ‘round—as measured by a clock10 minutes fast—he was gone.

Temp work is short-lived and I gladly left this job behind and concentrated on interviewing for permanent positions. What I find hardest as a female-to-male transsexual job-seeker is a female work-history I can’t allude to. Given that I graduated from college in 1992, look15 years younger than I am and leave my birth date off my CV, I am taken as a youngish man starting out in life. In reality, I juggled fulltime office work on college campuses, lunchtime and evening classes and primary custody of a teenage daughter to become the first person in my family to graduate from university at age 40.

I don’t want to lie even by omission, but most employers shy away from transsexual applicants. So if asked, “Why didn’t you pursue journalism out of college?” I’m afraid to say, “I couldn’t face undergoing a sex-change in a newsroom.” I refer instead to the (truthful) fact that during my two years of graduate school, local newspapers laid off one in five seasoned reporters who then competed for available jobs. Likewise answering, “My daughter was in high school and I didn’t want to drag her out to the boondocks where journalism jobs could be found,” raises eyebrows, for “real men” prioritize career over a child’s preferences. Not to mention, a teenaged daughter ten years ago provokes a double-take on my age and age-discrimination is a genuine concern.

So the sex-change improved my job prospects as I’m now perceived as younger and male, but I’m at a disadvantage because socialized as a girl in the 1950’s, I lack male competitiveness. As I knot my tie preparing for a coveted second interview I wonder, how would I be greeted walking in as my former self? Who would get the job in a competition, the fifty-something divorced mother or the thirty-something single man? In dedication, intelligence, university degree and job skills, the two are identical, however, each walks a very different path.

(A version of this was originally published in 2005 in Dublin's Village Magazine.)

(Photo: AP)

War madness….

I've been unable to update PWCD since Tuesday due to other pressing commitments. In that time, the situation in Israel, Gaza, and Lebanon has seriously deteriorated.

According to today's Guardian::
Israeli jets continued to bomb Lebanon on Friday, hitting the airport and 18 other targets as Jerusalem threatened to escalate its attack on the besieged country even further. Three people were killed. Hizbullah fired 13 more rockets at northern Israel, but caused little damage.

[snip]

Israeli aircraft hit offices, fuel depots, roads, bridges and junctions, killing three people and injuring 50, according to news agencies. About 50 people, including four Brazilians, have been killed since Israel started attacking Lebanon.

A spokeswoman for the Israeli army said aircraft had targeted 18 sites, including the airport, the offices of Hizbullah in Beirut, and bridges and sections of road on the Beirut-Damascus highway. The conflict has affected both the Lebanese and Israeli economies. Tourists in both countries have fled and stocks and currency values have plummeted.

Yet Israeli officials vowed to escalate the conflict and assassinate Hassan Nasrallah, the Hizbullah leader.

[snip]

The crisis in the north has completely overshadowed the situation in Gaza, where Israeli corporal Gilad Shalit remains a captive of Hamas and the already desperate living conditions of Gazans continue to deteriorate.

Piles of rubbish are mounting in the streets as there is no fuel for garbage trucks. The shortage of electricity, caused by airstrikes on a power station, means there is not enough power to pump sewage or water. Untreated sewage is running directly into the sea and crowds gather round water tanks to fill jerry cans and plastic bottles.

Virtually no wages have been paid to employees of the Palestinian Authority and the rest of the economy is at a standstill. Israel allows enough fuel and food to enter but Gazans cannot leave or enter the strip. Thousands have been stuck on the Egyptian border waiting to return home. The Red Cross reported that four people had died because of the lack of shelter and services.

Israel pulled its forces out of central Gaza overnight, although they remain in the south near Rafah. The air force continued to bomb parts of Gaza, hitting buildings, roads and bridges, and the army shelled northern Gaza, where a man was killed when a tank fired at his car.

Since the offensive began, Israeli forces have killed 86 Palestinians and one Israeli soldier in a friendly fire incident. Many of the dead were gunmen, but about a fifth were civilians. The latest victim was a 10-year-old boy who died in a hospital on Friday, four days after being wounded in Beit Lahiya in the north.
Meanwhile, on Thursday the US vetoed an Arab-backed UN resolution condemning Israel.

Way to go, USA!

The one country in the world who could put a stop to this carnage is currently under the control of a fanatical, bellicose right-wing cabal whose nominal figurehead is a spoiled, imbecilic, ego-driven and religiously-militant blockhead.

And no, I’m not talking about Iran, though the description likewise fits the Iranian political situation.

I am at a loss to understand exactly how any thinking person anywhere—in the US, Israel, Lebanon, Gaza, or elsewhere—can believe that this destruction and bloodshed will resolve anything. Has it ever?!

But then, resolution and peace aren't really the goals here, are they? No, the situation in Lebanon and Gaza is a blatant, depraved power grab for land and resources on the part of a US-backed ally, endorsed and financed by an American establishment who is itself, in this very moment, engaged its own murderous power grab in Iraq. In both cases, the atrociously one-sided destruction and disproportionate casualties work against a negotiated end to strife anytime soon.

When are we going to learn to lock up psychopaths like Bush and Olmert, rather than voting them into office?

Guardian story here.

11 July 2006


Bird flu update....

Given the mainstream media's ADHD, bird flu has pretty much dropped off the radar--and TV--screens.

Too bad the virus hasn't disappeared likewise.
In the first six months of 2006 the number of countries detecting infected birds has doubled. Case fatality remains extraordinarily high. And limited human to human transmission, with at least one moderately large cluster is becoming more evident. WHO continues to say most human infections come from poultry, although the evidence for this is not conclusive. Many cases have scant or no history. The feared easy person to person transmission has yet to occur, but the virus is not standing still. It continues to change genetically and move into wider and more varied niches. Sixty countries are said to be affected.

Southeast asia [sic] is said to have made progress controlling the disease and transmission to humans by aggressive programs of culling and vaccination, although the verdict is still out on whether this has truly worked. But meanwhile China, Indonesia and Africa struggle with their veterinary services and the hope of stamping out or controlling the spread in these places is slim. Too many birds, too wide an area, too little resources and public recognition of the problem. The virus is becoming endemic in a variety of bird species in large areas of the globe and is unlikely to go away soon.

[snip]

So it's mid July, now. Soon we will be moving into the northern hemisphere's colder months and "flu season." Most observers believe bird flu will also pick up speed.

Which is bad news, because it's already traveling awfully fast.
Effect Measure's bloggers, one of whom wrote the above, are all senior public health scientists and practitioners. Which lends credence to their concerns.

I'll confess, I'm the paranoid type. But what harm can it do to stock up on enough canned beans and rice, say, to get you through a couple weeks?

Full post here.

09 July 2006


(Photo from here.

The unholy slaughter continues...

This, from a July 2 op-ed, made only more relevant by the destruction and deaths of the past week.
If you read the press coverage in the United States, you get a misleading idea about the balance of violence. But, as Amnesty International notes, “Since the beginning of this year, Israeli forces have killed some 150 Palestinians, including some 25 children, and Palestinian armed groups have killed close to 20 Israelis, including two children.”

None of those Israelis, none of those Palestinians, none of those children should have died.

Meanwhile, the U.S. government, Israel’s chief sponsor (to the tune of more than $3 billion in aide a year), does nothing except to give Israel a wink and a nod. “Let the Palestinians sweat a little,” one U.S. aide told the Israeli paper Haaretz.

Israel’s policy of collective punishment is reprehensible.

So, too, is U.S. support for it.
According to today's NYT, the toll since Israel pushed into northern Gaza on Thursday: at least 40 Palestinians and one Israeli soldier killed.

Complete op-ed here.
Complete NYT story here.

07 July 2006




For shame....

My adopted country has yet to legalise abortion. Because of this, a woman seeking an abortion must cross the border, and most head for the UK.

This, from Salon's Broadsheet:
Among the news flashes we missed in the name of patriotism this week was the British Department of Health's release of the country's abortion statistics for 2005. Among the more distressing statistics was the number of Irish women who traveled to England and Wales to get abortions: 5,585, or an average of 15 a day.

The number represents a small percentage of the annual total of 186,400 U.K. abortions, but it's still pretty grim to think of the thousands of women forced to cross the border to terminate a pregnancy. And because department records only reflect the number of abortions performed on women who list Irish home addresses, rather than the U.K. addresses of friends or family members, the true tally may be higher.

Activists on both sides of the abortion debate sought to frame the statistic; choice advocates argued that Ireland needs to legalize abortion, while antiabortion voices noted that the number of Irish women seeking abortions in the U.K. is on the decline (it was 6,217 in 2004), so there's no need to make it legal back home. (Yes, yes, perfectly logical.) We're with Alliance for Choice spokeswoman Sian Muldowney, who sounded a little weary when she set out Ireland's reproductive-health to-do list: "Ireland needs to face up to its responsibility to Irish men and women to provide a comprehensive sex education strategy, a national sexual health services strategy and safe and legal abortion in Ireland."

In totally unrelated news, Reuters reports that the pope is traveling to Spain this weekend "to glorify traditional family values."
Story, which I've posted in its entirety, here (requires subscription).

Photograph: Samuel Aranda/Getty


Democracy in the Middle East....

But only if Israel and America agree with the election outcome.

As much as Israeli officials have protested their intention NOT to re-occupy Gaza, (see below), it's beginning to look suspiciously like an occupation.
...Yossi Alpher, a military analyst and former Israeli intelligence officer, said that the government and military will be trying to avoid becoming entrenched back in Gaza but they will also face political difficulties in extracting the army.

"They are very well aware of the dangers," he said. "But there are catches in trying to leave. The range [of the rockets] can improve further so you have to keep moving south and you move into highly urban areas, and it begins to look like an occupation again."
In addition to the stated goals of recovering kidnapped Corporal Gilad Shalit and putting a halt to rocket-fire into Israel, the unstated goal of deposing the democratically elected Hamas government is clearly behind the invasion.
But there are indications of a wider agenda to bury the Hamas-led government. Israel has detained eight Hamas cabinet members and 20 of its MPs, and targeted government infrastructure, including missile attacks on the offices of the prime minister and interior ministry.

"There's a school of thought in the Israeli security establishment that said since the Hamas victory this is going to end up in confrontation and the sooner we pre-empt that conflict the better; remove their leadership, destroy their infrastructure," said Mr Alpher. "That is certainly some of the hidden agenda of this operation but it's not a declared goal. But it could become a declared goal."
Complete story here.

06 July 2006

(Photo, taken at an earlier confrontation, can be found online here.

Why won't the world do something to stop this...?!
...At least 12 Palestinians and one Israeli soldier were killed in sometimes fierce fighting involving shootouts, artillery fire and airstrikes. Most of the deaths were in northern Gaza, although two Palestinian militants were killed in southern Gaza.

After days of sporadic clashes, Israeli forces pushed further into northern Gaza, moving south from the destroyed former Israeli settlements to the outskirts of Beit Lahiya, in the northwestern corner of Gaza, where Palestinian fighters had been preparing earth barricades, explosive charges and shooting positions.
Complete story here.

For decades, Palestinians have been seeking justice by peaceful and by violent means. September 11, 2001 had a much less violent antecedent nearly 31 years before almost to the day. A simultaneous hijacking of four airliners bound from Europe to New York which, if lessons had been heeded, would surely have prevented 2001’s tragedy.

Planned and executed by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) the September 6, 1970 hijackings were executed almost flawlessly. Two jets—TWA Flight 741 of Frankfurt and Swissair Flight 100 of Zurich--were forced down at a former RAF airstrip in Jordan called Dawson's Field. A third, Pan American Flight 93 of Amsterdam, too large for Dawson's, landed in Cairo where passengers and crew were evacuated and the plane blown up.

In an eerie parallel to 31 years later, the PFLP’s fourth hijacking attempt was foiled in flight. Pilots on El Al Flight 219 from Amsterdam plunged their jet into a dive, toppling the hijackers. An onboard security guard fatally shot one, Californian Patrick Arguello, 27, while passengers overpowered and arrested the other, Leila Khaled. (Still campaigning for Palestine’s liberation, Khaled, 61, addressed Dubliners at an event sponsored by the Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign late last year.)

In retaliation, PFLP operatives hijacked a fifth jet on September 9, adding it to the two planes on the ground in Jordan. On September 12, 1970, the three empty airliners were blown up while television crews broadcast the spectacle to the world. Jordan‘s King Hussein responded by declaring martial law, provoking a bloody civil war between Palestinian refugees and the Jordanian army. Some 15,000 people died before Palestinians, under Yassir Arafat, fled Jordan. The bloodbath spawned the infamous Black September Movement responsible for, among other actions, killing 10 Israeli athletes and their coach at the Munich Olympics two years later, again in early September. (The incident recently highlighted by Spielberg in his film, "Munich".)

The PFLP clearly spelled out their motive for the 1970 hijackings to be retribution for American arms-sales to Israel—sales which continue to this day. From its founding in 1948 through 1998, America has given Israel an estimated $83 billion in direct foreign aid—much of which has facilitated arms purchases.

To summarize, in 1970 one person was killed in five hijackings over six days; in 2001, some 3,044 people died in four hijackings in a matter of hours. Only a nation whose citizens are ignorant of history would view the two events as unrelated. Bin Laden and al Qaeda may be many things, but forgetful of history is not one of them.

Indeed, I question if U.S. leaders are so forgetful, including “Why-do-they-hate-us?” President Bush. On September 13, 1970, The New York Times published a letter condemning the PFLP hijackings and signed by Neocon godfather, Irving Podhoretz. In 1997, Podhoretz put his signature to the statement of principles for the Project for the New American Century, along with other Iraqi war proponents Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz.

Only by obscuring America’s complicity in Israel’s subjugation of the Palestinians could the Bush administration hope to persuade Americans to embark on the unprovoked invasion of Iraq. Only by suppressing the fact that 9/11 was not an isolated act masterminded by a madman but rather the culmination of increasingly desperate and deadly actions over more than 30 years, part of a campaign to convince Americans to deal justly with Palestinians, could Bush pursue his war for oil in the Middle East.

Justice, which we can plainly see, is still sickeningly lacking for Palestinians.

[A version of this, written by me, was published last year in Dublin's Village magazine.]



Hate wins today in court...

In a decision that will undoubtedly rally homophobes nationwide, New York's Court of Appeals ruled today that New York state law prohibits gay marriages.

According to the NY Times, it left open the possibility that the divided state Legislature could decide to allow same-sex marriages, but if so, it will happen only after a long uphill battle.

Two of the six judges dissented, one quite eloquently.

...In her often stirring dissent, Chief Judge Judith Kaye, joined by Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, offered a departure from the dry legal language of the main decision, noting that the plaintiffs represented a cross-section of ordinary New Yorkers, including a police officer, a doctor, a teacher and an artist, who wanted "only to live full lives, raise their children, better their communites and be good neighbors."

Judge Kaye added: "For most of us, leading a full life includes establishing a family," and looking forward to a wedding "as among the most significant events of their lives."

She suggested that it was wrong for the plaintiffs to be denied the rights and responsibilities of civil marriage, "because of who they love," adding that New York had a tradition of equal rights, and "the court today retreats from that proud tradition."
Indeed, it's wrong, as future generations will undoubtedly decide.

Complete story here.

Photo: The Jerusalem Times.

Israeli war crimes...

Israeli troops have occupied three abandoned Jewish settlements and part of a Palestinian town in the northern Gaza strip, to create what they're calling a "temporary buffer zone" against missile attacks into Israel.

As they kill Palestinians and destroy bridges, homes, roads, power-plants and other infrastructure they assure everyone, in the respectful language Israelis often use when referring to Palestinians, that their intention isn't to "reoccupy" Gaza.
...Israeli leaders said their aim is to stop the rocket fire and bring back the captured soldier, and there are no plans to reoccupy Gaza.

"We have no intention of drowning in the Gaza swamp," said Defense Minister Amir Peretz.
To be fair, I guess the defense minister could be speaking metaphorically, rather than descriptively. If so, he should choose his language more carefully.

Better still, he and his troops should respect international law instead of collectively punishing the civilians of Gaza for the uncontrollable actions of a few in direct defiance of Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Complete AP story here.

Photo: AP/L.A. Times, Luis Sinco


Bringing democracy to Iraq...

A Marine reservist back from Iraq has been accused of the attempted murder of three teens on the 4th of July. Apparently, the Aurora, Ill, shooting may be gang-related.

So far, there's nothing particularly surprising in that story. Tragically, Americans should brace themselves for a crime wave-to-be upon the return of the Iraq War's emotionally battle-scarred veterans.

The shocker is the final graf of the story:
Graffiti referencing Chicago-area gangs is increasingly being found in Iraq, according to recent reports in the Chicago Sun-Times. The spray-painted gang art has shown up on everything from armored vehicles to concrete barriers and bathroom stalls, and some fear it may indicate an increase in gang activity in the military.
Wow. We’ve exported our gang wars to the Middle East. Is this what Bush meant when he said we have to fight them over there so we don't fight them over here? (Or something to that effect.)

Complete AP wire story here.


Photo from Instapundit here.


Don't worry, America's fourth estate is on top of it...

Why is speculation on President Bush's alleged anxiety over turning 60 a front-page story in America's (undeserving) paper-of-record?!
...Could it be that Mr. Bush, with his enviably low heart rate and penchant for two-hour mountain bike rides that exhaust Secret Service agents half his age, is worried about getting old? Is that why the president, so mindful of proper attire that he demands a coat and tie in the Oval Office even on weekends, wore a decidedly youthful red-and-white Hawaiian shirt to his two-days-early birthday dinner in the East Room of the White House Tuesday night?
Earth-shatteringly important story here if you're desperately bored enough to want to read it.

04 July 2006


Composite image from "Painting the Earth."

Happy 4th...!

I like this idea from Oz at EarthFamilyAlpha.
Today is a good day to declare your Independence.

While others are celebrating their dependence on a division.

Join those who would use this day to declare their unity in

Independence.

From the oil oligarchy,

From anachronistic nationalism,

From your worn out operating system...
More here.