25 July 2006


"Sure, keep right on killing."
(Photo:Reuters, Pool. NYT.)

Disproportionate....

You decide:
Toll, since the outbreak:

Lebanon
Military deaths 66
Civilian deaths 377
Wounded 1,550+

Israel
Military deaths 24
Civilian deaths 17
Wounded 360+
Statistics from here.

Twice yesterday, a confrontational co-worker tried to start an argument over the Lebanese invasion, both times in an elevator.

As the man both outranks me to the point where one word and he could have me fired and he's a bully, I refrained from engaging with him. But his approach was remarkable.

The first time, this armchair warrior from the safety and comfort of our intact, modern office building thousands of miles from the scene of bloodshed, blustered (for the benefit of another man in the elevator) that “They should just roll over the whole thing. Level it!” referring to Lebanon.

“They are,” I thought to myself sadly, turning away from his arrogant smirk.

The second time, after telling me that his mother was from Tel Aviv, he proceeded to lecture me. “They,” he said, meaning “the Arabs,” won’t rest until Israel is “wiped from the map. Pushed into the sea. They won’t rest until they’re all dead!”

The last sentence was more than a little ambiguous, considering the relentless pounding Israel is delivering to Lebanon and Gaza. Though I’m almost certain the "they" he was referring to again was the “Arabs” and not the Israelis.

Thinking back on the disturbing exchanges, I marvelled on how innocent people are still dying for the sins of World War II. Almost in a time-warp, the Israelis are virtuously fighting to right the wrongs of the Nazis, and in so doing are sowing an entirely new legacy of bitterness and vengeance that will continue for generations.

Also, talk about psychological projection. One of the most militarily powerful nations on earth feels threatened by homemade rockets.

It would be laughable, if it wasn’t so heartbreakingly terrible.

24 July 2006


(Ghaith Abdul-Ahad/Getty Images.
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company.)

The face of war....

I just read this story in the NYT this morning.

My heart goes out to this little boy and his mother!!! To his entire family.

Sitting at my desk afterwards, I look around at my neat, clean, air-conditioned office. Co-workers sit busy at their desks, tapping on keyboards, murmuring on phones, working as part of a much larger team that daily amasses hundreds of thousands of Euro profit for our South African investment banking employers. Below us, through floor-to-ceiling plate glass, Monday morning’s customary swarm of motor and foot traffic clogs Dublin’s city streets.

This is madness! Continuing on with business as usual while two time zones away, the Israeli air force rains down terror on fleeing families. The two worlds, Lebanon and Ireland, are not unconnected. What is happening there is a direct consequence of a series of actions, some of which undoubtedly flow through Dublin. Only through our collusion—all of us, every single average working person in Britain, the US, Ireland, France, Germany, the world over—does this carnage continue. Every one of us performing our little part of the bigger picture.

Were we to stop work, put down our pens, hang up our phones, leave our office buildings, refuse to continue to produce the profits that enable the so-called “world leaders” to perpetrate this immoral outrage, it would have to stop.

Without our continuing on with business as usual, this would have to stop.

NYT story here.

22 July 2006


(From Middle East Online.

American complicity in war crimes....
WASHINGTON, July 21 — The Bush administration is rushing a delivery of precision-guided bombs to Israel, which requested the expedited shipment last week after beginning its air campaign against Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, American officials said Friday.

The decision to quickly ship the weapons to Israel was made with relatively little debate within the Bush administration, the officials said. Its disclosure threatens to anger Arab governments and others because of the appearance that the United States is actively aiding the Israeli bombing campaign in a way that could be compared to Iran’s efforts to arm and resupply Hezbollah.
The "appearance" that the United States is actively aiding the Israeli bombing campaign?

Say again?! The US is aiding the Israeli bombing campaign. Always has aided Israel in its wars against the Palestinians. And, I'm tempted to say based on the steadily rightward shift of US politics, always will. With weapons, tactical support, vetoes in the UN Security Council, diplomatic relations, PR, and billions of dollars in aid.

So, when the next strike occurs on American soil, will Bush and his supporters claim it's because the terrorists "hate freedom and democracy"?

I marched again today through Dublin's city centre in a demonstration organised by the Socialist Youth to "Stop the Bombing Now!" Our numbers were small but we were there, a sign that not everyone believes in going about with business as usual while innocent civilians are blown apart with American-made bombs and missiles, brutally losing their lives, limbs, livelihoods, homes, livestock, pets, books, EVERYTHING!

I am appalled that so many are standing by doing nothing as this travesty is carried out.

According to the rest of the pathetic story, Secretary of State Condie Rice is going to jet over to the region soon. She can't make unseemly haste, you see, as the Israelis need time to complete their slaughter.

I've lived in Israel. I believe in Israel's right to exist. But the horrific death and destruction the Jewish state is perpetrating in Lebanon and Gaza are nauseating in their utter lack of morality.

20 July 2006


Must read....

If only for the powerful analogy at the beginning:
The other day, a woman came up to me at a party and slapped me in the face simply because I had lied about her behavior in public, and maybe stole a little money from her dresser late one night. I had also started up with her best friend, and told her other friends that she was a lesbian.

Oh yeah, I kind of took her apartment in Malibu away from her and didn't give it back.

Anyway, I immediately pulled out my 38 and shot her on the spot.
Complete post at one of my favorite blogs, here.

(ISNA/Photo:MASHHAD)

Sad anniversary....

Yesterday marked the one-year anniversary of the brutal executions of two gay Iranian teenagers, Mahmoud Asgari and Ayaz Marhoni (above).

Their deaths are the predictable and tragic outcome of “Vice and Virtues” nonsense like that reported in my post yesterday. The two boys—and they were boys: while their reported ages varied, with them being allegedly as young as 14 and 16 at their arrests, no one disputes that they had not yet turned 20 by the time they were killed. The two boys were incarcerated and tortured for 14 months, then hanged, for allegedly raping a 13-year-old boy. This accusation has been universally disputed by all but the most hardened homophobes.

Their real crime was engaging in a long-term consensual sexual relationship with each other in a country governed by Sharia. One speaker at a rally to honour the boys that I attended in Dublin’s city centre yesterday evening, Irish Senator David Norris, said a family member likely turned the boys in to the “religious” police.

So much for “family values.”

As religious fundamentalism strengthens its hold in countries as diverse as the US, Russia, Poland, Nigeria, and throughout the Middle East, LGBT folks are increasingly coming under both metaphorical and all-too-real fire. Calls for a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage in the US, with the ensuing bashings and deaths such homophobic rhetoric fosters. Beheadings of gays in Saudi Arabia. Abductions, torture and murders of suspected gays in Iraq. Executions of gays by stoning in Nigeria. Police sanctioned beatings of demonstrators at a Gay Pride parade in Russia.

And this brutal hanging a year ago in Iran.

As speakers emphasised yesterday, this is not an LGBT issue, it’s a human rights issue.

Mahmoud Asgari and Ayaz Marhoni will be remembered.

19 July 2006


(Photo here.)


Vice and virtue in the Middle East....

Afghanistan has announced plans to re-establish its "Vice and Virtues Ministry," the infamous government body which under the Taliban was charged with enforcing bans on morally questionable activities like girls' schools, television, card-playing, kite-flying and women's public baths.

But don't worry! Despite the identical name, girls who'd like to read, women who'd prefer to bathe, fans of Tolo TV, poker enthusiasts, kite-lovers and others, such as gays who'd rather leave the closet behind and artists who believe in freedom of expression, all have nothing to fear.
Karim Rahimi, Karzai's spokesman, said Afghans should not be worried.

"The people were scared of the Vice and Virtues Ministry under the Taliban, but this new ministry won't be like the Taliban's," Rahimi said. "It will take into consideration moral and religious activities to help improve Afghan society."
Oh, that's reassuring. The ministry will help improve Afghan society.

Lord knows it could use some improving. Afghanistan under American occupation is a country where, in May of 2005, a popular but controversial female TV presenter, Shaima Rezayee, 24, was shot dead in her home, execution style, one bullet to the head.

Victim of a family “honour killing"? Or of a religious zealot who believed no woman should appear on TV, especially in semi-western style clothing? Is there even a distinction between those two, other than that the latter could be a stranger? Her killing left a fellow male television presenter cowering in the studio, afraid to go home and desperately seeking asylum outside the country.

So, presumably with this new ministry in operation, Rezayee would never have had the opportunity of appearing on TV. Instead, shut away in the backroom of some Kabul home, unbathed, illiterate, and married to a man 30 years her senior, she may have still been "alive."

Salon story (requires subscription or ad-viewing) here.

18 July 2006


(Thor Swift for The New York Times)

FTM scientist speaks out...!

Dr. Ben A. Barres, who has a degree in biology from M.I.T., a medical degree from Dartmouth, a doctorate in neurobiology from Harvard and teaches at Stanford (!) explodes some sexist myths in a courageous commentary in the journal, Nature, and in this short interview in the NYT.
...Q.What about the idea that men and women differ in ways that give men an advantage in science?

A. People are still arguing over whether there are cognitive differences between men and women. If they exist, it’s not clear they are innate, and if they are innate, it’s not clear they are relevant. They are subtle, and they may even benefit women.

But when you tell people about the studies documenting bias, if they are prejudiced, they just discount the evidence.

Q. How does this bias manifest itself?

A. It is very much harder for women to be successful, to get jobs, to get grants, especially big grants. And then, and this is a huge part of the problem, they don’t get the resources they need to be successful. Right now, what’s fundamentally missing and absolutely vital is that women get better child care support. This is such an obvious no-brainer. If you just do this with a small amount of resources, you could explode the number of women scientists.

[snip]

Q. Why didn’t you see these episodes as sexism?

A. Women who are really highly successful, they are just as bad as the men. They think if they can do it, anyone can do it. They don’t see that for every woman who makes it to the top there are 10 more who are passed over. And I am not making this up, that’s what the data show.

And it may be that some women — and African-Americans, too — identify less strongly with their particular group. From the time I was a child, from the littlest, littlest age, I did not identify as a girl. It never occurred to me that I could not be a scientist because I was a woman. It just rolled off my back.

Now I wonder, maybe I just didn’t take these stereotypes so seriously because I did not identify myself as a woman.
I am so impressed with Dr. Barres' courage.

For one thing, he is outing himself (with photo!) in one of the most public forums possible: the pages of the New York Times.

When I was shortly out of journalism school, I went for advice to one of my former professors. A letter I'd submitted to the editor of the NYT in which I'd identified myself as FTM had been accepted for publication, but their editorial policy reasonably demanded I use my name. My professor, a former NYT reporter herself, advised that I assume everyone I knew would read the letter. If I wasn't prepared to out myself to everyone, then best not go forward.

I wasn't. My teenaged daughter lived with me at the time and attended a local high school and I worried about the possible consequences to her. So I pulled the letter.

Dr. Barres, on the other hand, is bravely going forward.

I am sure he knows better than anyone just how conservative--and sexist--the scientific and academic worlds are. From this point on, he will be widely known as the "transsexual scientist." His opinions and work will be taken less seriously by many. Future grant applications could be affected. And I sincerely hope he already has tenure at Stanford, for notoriety like this could hurt his chances.

I so admire that he felt strongly enough about women and feminism to take this brave stand.

Nature editor's summary is here. (The commentary itself must be purchased.)

And the NYT's interview here.

[Typo corrected 15:47 18/7/06.]

16 July 2006


Next target: Iran...?

On Irish radio this morning comes the alarming news that at least eight Israelis have been killed in Haifa (Israel's third largest city) by a Hezbollah missile strike. In response Israel is accusing Syria and Iran of culpability and threatening further vengeance. Meanwhile, the US government and Tony Blair keep reiterating "Israel's right to defend itself." President Bush was on Irish radio this morning from St. Petersburg, accusing Iran and Syria of supporting terrorism.

This disturbing rhetoric is truly frightening, especially in light of the assertion here that the current hostilities between Israel and Lebanon started with a deliberate provocation by Israel. [Hat tip to Shakespeare's Sister.]

If Israel really did entice Hezbollah to kidnap Israeli soldiers by deliberately placing them in harm's way, it's hard not to conclude that Israel's goal all along has been to create an incident to provide an excuse to invade Lebanon. The massive scope, rapidity and coordination of Israel's operation certainly lends credence to this theory. As does their destruction of the Beirut airport, bridges, roadways, a lighthouse, apartment complexes and other civilian targets.

So, if this is true, what to make of the escalating Israeli rhetoric?

Go back in time several months. When President Bush recently began (again) characterising Iran as an imminent threat to US security, using almost the exact rhetoric his regime employed in the lead up to the Iraq invasion, I began bracing myself for a US air invasion of Iran. (The US does not currently possess the ground troops to invade Iran by land.) Worse, given Seymour Hersh's reporting in The New Yorker, I’ve been terrified of a nuclear air war.

Facing mid-term Congressional elections in November in which they might lose control of at least one branch of the legislature, along with widespread and growing American opposition to the war in Iraq, it’s highly unlikely that Republicans would invade Iran without “serious provocation.” For this reason, among others, I’ve been bracing myself for “another 9/11.”

A second scenario, however, has always been that Israel would take the lead on an Iranian invasion by bombing selected targets in Iran, using the excuse that their own security was threatened, provoking an Iranian military response against Israel which would then “cause” America (and Great Britain) to jump in to defend their ally.

The second scenario may be unfolding before our eyes in this very moment.

I am seriously freaking out at this prospect.

The potential loss of life in the hundreds of thousands and the human suffering is horrific to contemplate.

As a friend of mine says, the human capacity for destruction and cruelty is heartbreaking, especially in light of the potential for beauty and love.

15 July 2006


The face of America abroad....

Ann Coulter was interviewed on Dublin’s Talk Radio 106 “Wide Angle” show this morning by one of my favorite journalists, Karen Coleman (not related to RTE's Carole Coleman who held Bush’s feet to the fire in a legendary 2004 TV interview).

Unfortunately, this morning’s interview was recorded which meant that callers, like me, couldn't suggest questions. But Karen didn't do too badly. She challenged Coulter more than gutless American journalists. And Coulter, as batshit insane as ever, came off sounding—especially to a more informed Irish audience--as culturally chauvinistic, historically uninformed, religiously fanatical, uncharitable, foolhardy and rude. In other words, par for the course.

I did manage to get a comment read on air, as coming from an "American caller" which basically said that Coulter isn't widely supported in America but instead is regarded as an extremist and apologist for the American fundamentalist right-wing fascist fringe.

Not exactly what I said, but close enough!

Applying logic to the Middle East....

This excellent article in Salon (requires subscription or ad-viewing) articulately states what I've been trying to say since September 11, 2001 (and before): the situation in the Middle East will only be worsened by the US and Israel applying violence. The past three years' events support this conclusion.
...The Lebanese and Palestinians have responded to Israel's persistent and increasingly savage attacks against entire civilian populations by creating parallel or alternative leaderships that can protect them and deliver essential services. With every new Israeli attack against the Hamas and Hezbollah leadership or the civilian populations, four important things happen, and will probably happen during this round of war: The Lebanese and Palestinian governments lose power and impact; Hamas and Hezbollah garner greater popular support, which enhances their effectiveness in guerrilla and resistance warfare; they expand their military technical capabilities (mainly longer-range missiles and better improvised explosive devices); and the anti-Israel, anti-U.S. resistance campaign led by Hamas and Hezbollah generates widespread political and popular support throughout the Middle East and much of the world.

[snip]

The fourth pair of actors, the United States and Israel, find themselves in the bizarre position of repeating policies that have consistently failed for the past 40 years. Israel has this to show for its track record of being tough: It is now surrounded by two robust Islamist resistance movements with greater striking power and popular support; Arab populations around the region that increasingly vote for Islamist political movements whenever elections are held; immobilized and virtually irrelevant Arab governments in many nearby lands; and determined, increasingly defiant, ideological foes in Tehran and Damascus who do not hesitate to use all weapons at their means however damaging these may be to civilians and sovereignty in Lebanon and Palestine. [emphasis mine]

The United States for its part is strangely marginal. Its chosen policies have lined it up squarely with Israel. It has sanctioned and thus cannot even talk to Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas, and it has pressured and threatened Syria for years without any real success. The world's sole superpower is peculiarly powerless in the current crisis in the Middle East.

As long as these four pairs of main actors [Hamas and Hezbollah; the Palestinian and Lebanese governments; Syria and Iran; and Israel and the United States] persist in their intemperate policies, the consequences will remain grim. The way to break this cycle is for all actors to negotiate a political solution that responds to their legitimate grievances and demands. Everyone involved seems prepared to do this, except for Israel and the United States, who rely on military force, prolonged occupations, and diplomatic sanctions and threats. What will Israel and the United States do when there are no more Arab airports, bridges and power stations to destroy? The futility of such policies should be clear by now, and therefore a diplomatic solution should be sought seriously for the first time.
Read the full piece here.

14 July 2006


Magic of work....

With low unemployment and Ireland’s “Celtic Tiger,” it took me only two months to find a permanent job in Dublin. What’s more, the temp assignments that sustained me until then were far pleasanter than any I found in New York. That includes my five-month stint at ABC-Disney in Manhattan which, glamorous as it sounds, translated into enduring 21 weeks and three days of insults and temper tantrums at the hands of two spoiled producers of children’s programming. Magic kingdom indeed.

My other New York temp job was assistant to a senior VP of international branding. I came aboard Weider Publications just after the family-owned business sold out to a conglomerate, at a time when my boss was secretly organizing her department’s downsizing. Weeks of preparation culminated in a Monday morning bloodbath in which unsuspecting employees came to work only to be laid off before lunch and shown the door by security guards. Travel mugs sat, coffee going cold, on desks that would never again see their occupants. Wednesday, my boss was stunned to receive her own pink slip and I spent my final days there packing company freebies, pricey knick-knacks and expensive “product samples” for her to spirit away.

Improving upon those shining examples of neoliberalism was easy. My first Irish temp assignment was routine admin-support for Boots pharmacy and while their computer hardware was antiquated, software ancient and Internet connection dial-up, they were friendly, appreciative and a pleasure to work for.

Next came the mailroom of a Dutch investment company, where I made the acquaintance of the laziest person I’ve ever met. Scottish (just an observation, no reflection on Scotland!) and twenty-something, your man lived 15 minutes’ walk from work yet didn’t arrive on time once in six days. Forty-five minutes late, the first words out of his mouth would be, in his heavy brogue which I can't begin to recreate here, “Three buses went by without stopping!” Or, “Fell asleep on the bus and missed my stop!”

This hapless victim of a global conspiracy to make him late would then hand me half the work and head out to purchase a sticky bun. After eating breakfast while checking his email, he’d begin his daily routine of telephone calls to friends and cigarette breaks. By lunchtime, he’d have given me the other half of the work and as new work came in, he gave it to me without a pretense of taking half. He surfed the net, gossiped, fetched free Cokes from the canteen and disappeared, reeking of cigarettes on his return, while I stuffed envelopes, franked letters and logged courier packages. When half five rolled ‘round—as measured by a clock10 minutes fast—he was gone.

Temp work is short-lived and I gladly left this job behind and concentrated on interviewing for permanent positions. What I find hardest as a female-to-male transsexual job-seeker is a female work-history I can’t allude to. Given that I graduated from college in 1992, look15 years younger than I am and leave my birth date off my CV, I am taken as a youngish man starting out in life. In reality, I juggled fulltime office work on college campuses, lunchtime and evening classes and primary custody of a teenage daughter to become the first person in my family to graduate from university at age 40.

I don’t want to lie even by omission, but most employers shy away from transsexual applicants. So if asked, “Why didn’t you pursue journalism out of college?” I’m afraid to say, “I couldn’t face undergoing a sex-change in a newsroom.” I refer instead to the (truthful) fact that during my two years of graduate school, local newspapers laid off one in five seasoned reporters who then competed for available jobs. Likewise answering, “My daughter was in high school and I didn’t want to drag her out to the boondocks where journalism jobs could be found,” raises eyebrows, for “real men” prioritize career over a child’s preferences. Not to mention, a teenaged daughter ten years ago provokes a double-take on my age and age-discrimination is a genuine concern.

So the sex-change improved my job prospects as I’m now perceived as younger and male, but I’m at a disadvantage because socialized as a girl in the 1950’s, I lack male competitiveness. As I knot my tie preparing for a coveted second interview I wonder, how would I be greeted walking in as my former self? Who would get the job in a competition, the fifty-something divorced mother or the thirty-something single man? In dedication, intelligence, university degree and job skills, the two are identical, however, each walks a very different path.

(A version of this was originally published in 2005 in Dublin's Village Magazine.)

(Photo: AP)

War madness….

I've been unable to update PWCD since Tuesday due to other pressing commitments. In that time, the situation in Israel, Gaza, and Lebanon has seriously deteriorated.

According to today's Guardian::
Israeli jets continued to bomb Lebanon on Friday, hitting the airport and 18 other targets as Jerusalem threatened to escalate its attack on the besieged country even further. Three people were killed. Hizbullah fired 13 more rockets at northern Israel, but caused little damage.

[snip]

Israeli aircraft hit offices, fuel depots, roads, bridges and junctions, killing three people and injuring 50, according to news agencies. About 50 people, including four Brazilians, have been killed since Israel started attacking Lebanon.

A spokeswoman for the Israeli army said aircraft had targeted 18 sites, including the airport, the offices of Hizbullah in Beirut, and bridges and sections of road on the Beirut-Damascus highway. The conflict has affected both the Lebanese and Israeli economies. Tourists in both countries have fled and stocks and currency values have plummeted.

Yet Israeli officials vowed to escalate the conflict and assassinate Hassan Nasrallah, the Hizbullah leader.

[snip]

The crisis in the north has completely overshadowed the situation in Gaza, where Israeli corporal Gilad Shalit remains a captive of Hamas and the already desperate living conditions of Gazans continue to deteriorate.

Piles of rubbish are mounting in the streets as there is no fuel for garbage trucks. The shortage of electricity, caused by airstrikes on a power station, means there is not enough power to pump sewage or water. Untreated sewage is running directly into the sea and crowds gather round water tanks to fill jerry cans and plastic bottles.

Virtually no wages have been paid to employees of the Palestinian Authority and the rest of the economy is at a standstill. Israel allows enough fuel and food to enter but Gazans cannot leave or enter the strip. Thousands have been stuck on the Egyptian border waiting to return home. The Red Cross reported that four people had died because of the lack of shelter and services.

Israel pulled its forces out of central Gaza overnight, although they remain in the south near Rafah. The air force continued to bomb parts of Gaza, hitting buildings, roads and bridges, and the army shelled northern Gaza, where a man was killed when a tank fired at his car.

Since the offensive began, Israeli forces have killed 86 Palestinians and one Israeli soldier in a friendly fire incident. Many of the dead were gunmen, but about a fifth were civilians. The latest victim was a 10-year-old boy who died in a hospital on Friday, four days after being wounded in Beit Lahiya in the north.
Meanwhile, on Thursday the US vetoed an Arab-backed UN resolution condemning Israel.

Way to go, USA!

The one country in the world who could put a stop to this carnage is currently under the control of a fanatical, bellicose right-wing cabal whose nominal figurehead is a spoiled, imbecilic, ego-driven and religiously-militant blockhead.

And no, I’m not talking about Iran, though the description likewise fits the Iranian political situation.

I am at a loss to understand exactly how any thinking person anywhere—in the US, Israel, Lebanon, Gaza, or elsewhere—can believe that this destruction and bloodshed will resolve anything. Has it ever?!

But then, resolution and peace aren't really the goals here, are they? No, the situation in Lebanon and Gaza is a blatant, depraved power grab for land and resources on the part of a US-backed ally, endorsed and financed by an American establishment who is itself, in this very moment, engaged its own murderous power grab in Iraq. In both cases, the atrociously one-sided destruction and disproportionate casualties work against a negotiated end to strife anytime soon.

When are we going to learn to lock up psychopaths like Bush and Olmert, rather than voting them into office?

Guardian story here.

11 July 2006


Bird flu update....

Given the mainstream media's ADHD, bird flu has pretty much dropped off the radar--and TV--screens.

Too bad the virus hasn't disappeared likewise.
In the first six months of 2006 the number of countries detecting infected birds has doubled. Case fatality remains extraordinarily high. And limited human to human transmission, with at least one moderately large cluster is becoming more evident. WHO continues to say most human infections come from poultry, although the evidence for this is not conclusive. Many cases have scant or no history. The feared easy person to person transmission has yet to occur, but the virus is not standing still. It continues to change genetically and move into wider and more varied niches. Sixty countries are said to be affected.

Southeast asia [sic] is said to have made progress controlling the disease and transmission to humans by aggressive programs of culling and vaccination, although the verdict is still out on whether this has truly worked. But meanwhile China, Indonesia and Africa struggle with their veterinary services and the hope of stamping out or controlling the spread in these places is slim. Too many birds, too wide an area, too little resources and public recognition of the problem. The virus is becoming endemic in a variety of bird species in large areas of the globe and is unlikely to go away soon.

[snip]

So it's mid July, now. Soon we will be moving into the northern hemisphere's colder months and "flu season." Most observers believe bird flu will also pick up speed.

Which is bad news, because it's already traveling awfully fast.
Effect Measure's bloggers, one of whom wrote the above, are all senior public health scientists and practitioners. Which lends credence to their concerns.

I'll confess, I'm the paranoid type. But what harm can it do to stock up on enough canned beans and rice, say, to get you through a couple weeks?

Full post here.

09 July 2006


(Photo from here.

The unholy slaughter continues...

This, from a July 2 op-ed, made only more relevant by the destruction and deaths of the past week.
If you read the press coverage in the United States, you get a misleading idea about the balance of violence. But, as Amnesty International notes, “Since the beginning of this year, Israeli forces have killed some 150 Palestinians, including some 25 children, and Palestinian armed groups have killed close to 20 Israelis, including two children.”

None of those Israelis, none of those Palestinians, none of those children should have died.

Meanwhile, the U.S. government, Israel’s chief sponsor (to the tune of more than $3 billion in aide a year), does nothing except to give Israel a wink and a nod. “Let the Palestinians sweat a little,” one U.S. aide told the Israeli paper Haaretz.

Israel’s policy of collective punishment is reprehensible.

So, too, is U.S. support for it.
According to today's NYT, the toll since Israel pushed into northern Gaza on Thursday: at least 40 Palestinians and one Israeli soldier killed.

Complete op-ed here.
Complete NYT story here.

07 July 2006




For shame....

My adopted country has yet to legalise abortion. Because of this, a woman seeking an abortion must cross the border, and most head for the UK.

This, from Salon's Broadsheet:
Among the news flashes we missed in the name of patriotism this week was the British Department of Health's release of the country's abortion statistics for 2005. Among the more distressing statistics was the number of Irish women who traveled to England and Wales to get abortions: 5,585, or an average of 15 a day.

The number represents a small percentage of the annual total of 186,400 U.K. abortions, but it's still pretty grim to think of the thousands of women forced to cross the border to terminate a pregnancy. And because department records only reflect the number of abortions performed on women who list Irish home addresses, rather than the U.K. addresses of friends or family members, the true tally may be higher.

Activists on both sides of the abortion debate sought to frame the statistic; choice advocates argued that Ireland needs to legalize abortion, while antiabortion voices noted that the number of Irish women seeking abortions in the U.K. is on the decline (it was 6,217 in 2004), so there's no need to make it legal back home. (Yes, yes, perfectly logical.) We're with Alliance for Choice spokeswoman Sian Muldowney, who sounded a little weary when she set out Ireland's reproductive-health to-do list: "Ireland needs to face up to its responsibility to Irish men and women to provide a comprehensive sex education strategy, a national sexual health services strategy and safe and legal abortion in Ireland."

In totally unrelated news, Reuters reports that the pope is traveling to Spain this weekend "to glorify traditional family values."
Story, which I've posted in its entirety, here (requires subscription).

Photograph: Samuel Aranda/Getty


Democracy in the Middle East....

But only if Israel and America agree with the election outcome.

As much as Israeli officials have protested their intention NOT to re-occupy Gaza, (see below), it's beginning to look suspiciously like an occupation.
...Yossi Alpher, a military analyst and former Israeli intelligence officer, said that the government and military will be trying to avoid becoming entrenched back in Gaza but they will also face political difficulties in extracting the army.

"They are very well aware of the dangers," he said. "But there are catches in trying to leave. The range [of the rockets] can improve further so you have to keep moving south and you move into highly urban areas, and it begins to look like an occupation again."
In addition to the stated goals of recovering kidnapped Corporal Gilad Shalit and putting a halt to rocket-fire into Israel, the unstated goal of deposing the democratically elected Hamas government is clearly behind the invasion.
But there are indications of a wider agenda to bury the Hamas-led government. Israel has detained eight Hamas cabinet members and 20 of its MPs, and targeted government infrastructure, including missile attacks on the offices of the prime minister and interior ministry.

"There's a school of thought in the Israeli security establishment that said since the Hamas victory this is going to end up in confrontation and the sooner we pre-empt that conflict the better; remove their leadership, destroy their infrastructure," said Mr Alpher. "That is certainly some of the hidden agenda of this operation but it's not a declared goal. But it could become a declared goal."
Complete story here.

06 July 2006

(Photo, taken at an earlier confrontation, can be found online here.

Why won't the world do something to stop this...?!
...At least 12 Palestinians and one Israeli soldier were killed in sometimes fierce fighting involving shootouts, artillery fire and airstrikes. Most of the deaths were in northern Gaza, although two Palestinian militants were killed in southern Gaza.

After days of sporadic clashes, Israeli forces pushed further into northern Gaza, moving south from the destroyed former Israeli settlements to the outskirts of Beit Lahiya, in the northwestern corner of Gaza, where Palestinian fighters had been preparing earth barricades, explosive charges and shooting positions.
Complete story here.

For decades, Palestinians have been seeking justice by peaceful and by violent means. September 11, 2001 had a much less violent antecedent nearly 31 years before almost to the day. A simultaneous hijacking of four airliners bound from Europe to New York which, if lessons had been heeded, would surely have prevented 2001’s tragedy.

Planned and executed by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) the September 6, 1970 hijackings were executed almost flawlessly. Two jets—TWA Flight 741 of Frankfurt and Swissair Flight 100 of Zurich--were forced down at a former RAF airstrip in Jordan called Dawson's Field. A third, Pan American Flight 93 of Amsterdam, too large for Dawson's, landed in Cairo where passengers and crew were evacuated and the plane blown up.

In an eerie parallel to 31 years later, the PFLP’s fourth hijacking attempt was foiled in flight. Pilots on El Al Flight 219 from Amsterdam plunged their jet into a dive, toppling the hijackers. An onboard security guard fatally shot one, Californian Patrick Arguello, 27, while passengers overpowered and arrested the other, Leila Khaled. (Still campaigning for Palestine’s liberation, Khaled, 61, addressed Dubliners at an event sponsored by the Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign late last year.)

In retaliation, PFLP operatives hijacked a fifth jet on September 9, adding it to the two planes on the ground in Jordan. On September 12, 1970, the three empty airliners were blown up while television crews broadcast the spectacle to the world. Jordan‘s King Hussein responded by declaring martial law, provoking a bloody civil war between Palestinian refugees and the Jordanian army. Some 15,000 people died before Palestinians, under Yassir Arafat, fled Jordan. The bloodbath spawned the infamous Black September Movement responsible for, among other actions, killing 10 Israeli athletes and their coach at the Munich Olympics two years later, again in early September. (The incident recently highlighted by Spielberg in his film, "Munich".)

The PFLP clearly spelled out their motive for the 1970 hijackings to be retribution for American arms-sales to Israel—sales which continue to this day. From its founding in 1948 through 1998, America has given Israel an estimated $83 billion in direct foreign aid—much of which has facilitated arms purchases.

To summarize, in 1970 one person was killed in five hijackings over six days; in 2001, some 3,044 people died in four hijackings in a matter of hours. Only a nation whose citizens are ignorant of history would view the two events as unrelated. Bin Laden and al Qaeda may be many things, but forgetful of history is not one of them.

Indeed, I question if U.S. leaders are so forgetful, including “Why-do-they-hate-us?” President Bush. On September 13, 1970, The New York Times published a letter condemning the PFLP hijackings and signed by Neocon godfather, Irving Podhoretz. In 1997, Podhoretz put his signature to the statement of principles for the Project for the New American Century, along with other Iraqi war proponents Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz.

Only by obscuring America’s complicity in Israel’s subjugation of the Palestinians could the Bush administration hope to persuade Americans to embark on the unprovoked invasion of Iraq. Only by suppressing the fact that 9/11 was not an isolated act masterminded by a madman but rather the culmination of increasingly desperate and deadly actions over more than 30 years, part of a campaign to convince Americans to deal justly with Palestinians, could Bush pursue his war for oil in the Middle East.

Justice, which we can plainly see, is still sickeningly lacking for Palestinians.

[A version of this, written by me, was published last year in Dublin's Village magazine.]



Hate wins today in court...

In a decision that will undoubtedly rally homophobes nationwide, New York's Court of Appeals ruled today that New York state law prohibits gay marriages.

According to the NY Times, it left open the possibility that the divided state Legislature could decide to allow same-sex marriages, but if so, it will happen only after a long uphill battle.

Two of the six judges dissented, one quite eloquently.

...In her often stirring dissent, Chief Judge Judith Kaye, joined by Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, offered a departure from the dry legal language of the main decision, noting that the plaintiffs represented a cross-section of ordinary New Yorkers, including a police officer, a doctor, a teacher and an artist, who wanted "only to live full lives, raise their children, better their communites and be good neighbors."

Judge Kaye added: "For most of us, leading a full life includes establishing a family," and looking forward to a wedding "as among the most significant events of their lives."

She suggested that it was wrong for the plaintiffs to be denied the rights and responsibilities of civil marriage, "because of who they love," adding that New York had a tradition of equal rights, and "the court today retreats from that proud tradition."
Indeed, it's wrong, as future generations will undoubtedly decide.

Complete story here.

Photo: The Jerusalem Times.

Israeli war crimes...

Israeli troops have occupied three abandoned Jewish settlements and part of a Palestinian town in the northern Gaza strip, to create what they're calling a "temporary buffer zone" against missile attacks into Israel.

As they kill Palestinians and destroy bridges, homes, roads, power-plants and other infrastructure they assure everyone, in the respectful language Israelis often use when referring to Palestinians, that their intention isn't to "reoccupy" Gaza.
...Israeli leaders said their aim is to stop the rocket fire and bring back the captured soldier, and there are no plans to reoccupy Gaza.

"We have no intention of drowning in the Gaza swamp," said Defense Minister Amir Peretz.
To be fair, I guess the defense minister could be speaking metaphorically, rather than descriptively. If so, he should choose his language more carefully.

Better still, he and his troops should respect international law instead of collectively punishing the civilians of Gaza for the uncontrollable actions of a few in direct defiance of Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Complete AP story here.

Photo: AP/L.A. Times, Luis Sinco


Bringing democracy to Iraq...

A Marine reservist back from Iraq has been accused of the attempted murder of three teens on the 4th of July. Apparently, the Aurora, Ill, shooting may be gang-related.

So far, there's nothing particularly surprising in that story. Tragically, Americans should brace themselves for a crime wave-to-be upon the return of the Iraq War's emotionally battle-scarred veterans.

The shocker is the final graf of the story:
Graffiti referencing Chicago-area gangs is increasingly being found in Iraq, according to recent reports in the Chicago Sun-Times. The spray-painted gang art has shown up on everything from armored vehicles to concrete barriers and bathroom stalls, and some fear it may indicate an increase in gang activity in the military.
Wow. We’ve exported our gang wars to the Middle East. Is this what Bush meant when he said we have to fight them over there so we don't fight them over here? (Or something to that effect.)

Complete AP wire story here.


Photo from Instapundit here.


Don't worry, America's fourth estate is on top of it...

Why is speculation on President Bush's alleged anxiety over turning 60 a front-page story in America's (undeserving) paper-of-record?!
...Could it be that Mr. Bush, with his enviably low heart rate and penchant for two-hour mountain bike rides that exhaust Secret Service agents half his age, is worried about getting old? Is that why the president, so mindful of proper attire that he demands a coat and tie in the Oval Office even on weekends, wore a decidedly youthful red-and-white Hawaiian shirt to his two-days-early birthday dinner in the East Room of the White House Tuesday night?
Earth-shatteringly important story here if you're desperately bored enough to want to read it.

04 July 2006


Composite image from "Painting the Earth."

Happy 4th...!

I like this idea from Oz at EarthFamilyAlpha.
Today is a good day to declare your Independence.

While others are celebrating their dependence on a division.

Join those who would use this day to declare their unity in

Independence.

From the oil oligarchy,

From anachronistic nationalism,

From your worn out operating system...
More here.
Nuclear option off the table...

Thank goodness! Never thought I'd see the day that I'd be thankful to military men who put the brakes on a civilian president.
...In late April, the military leadership, headed by General Pace, achieved a major victory when the White House dropped its insistence that the plan for a bombing campaign include the possible use of a nuclear device to destroy Iran’s uranium-enrichment plant at Natanz, nearly two hundred miles south of Tehran....
Of course, Bush/Cheney and their dogs of war are so unscrupulous, I'm not entirely breathing easy. They may do an end run around Pace and the generals.

According to Seymour Hersh, one of the most principled journalists left in America, Pace resorted to political, economic and strategic arguments to dissuade Bush from nuclear weapons. U.S. military intelligence has come up empty on nuclear weapons sites in Iran. (In other words, Iran may be telling the truth about wanting to develop nuclear power for civilian use only.) If America starts bombing indiscriminately, so the argument goes, Iran could effectively shut down the world's oil supply, resulting in serious economic consequences for America and political costs for Bush.

Sad, isn't it, that economic and political arguments work where the prospect of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians deaths doesn't?

That Bush openly considered using nuclear weapons in what would be the first nuclear strike since Nagasaki, and this against a country with which the U.S. is not at war, and American citizens did not fill the streets in non-violent protest has got to be one of the lowest moments in American history. How utterly shameful that it's the military who stood up to the president on this and not the American people.

Iran and the world are not home free. Bush/Cheney are still going forward with military contingency plans. The same Bush who, Hersh writes, remains "confident in his military decisions." In blind defiance of every shred of evidence.

Even the prospect of Iranian volunteers flooding Iraq in the thousands to attack American soldiers in revenge for an American air war against Iran doesn't dissuade the blood-thirsty Republican hawks, who insanely claim such a development would divide Iraqi Shiites into pro- and anti-Iranian camps and unify Iraqi Kurds and the Sunnis.

Complete story here.

White House photo by David Bohrer

Sneaky and subversive...

This profile of David Addington by Jane Mayer in the New Yorker is a must read for anyone wanting to understand Bush and Cheney's grab for absolute power.

Addington is the brilliant but sinister (and socially inept, although that might go without saying given he's a Republican lawyer) legalistic mind behind it.

Consider this excerpt alone:
...Fein suggested that the only way Congress will be able to reassert its power is by cutting off funds to the executive branch for programs that it thinks are illegal. But this approach has been tried, and here, too, Addington has had the last word. John Murtha, the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, put a provision in the Pentagon’s appropriations bills for 2005 and 2006 forbidding the use of federal funds for any intelligence-gathering that violates the Fourth Amendment, which protects the privacy of American citizens. The White House, however, took exception to Congress’s effort to cut off funds. When President Bush signed the appropriations bills into law, he appended “signing statements” asserting that the Commander-in-Chief had the right to collect intelligence in any way he deemed necessary. The signing statement for the 2005 budget, for instance, noted that the executive branch would “construe” the spending limit only “in a manner consistent with the President’s constitutional authority as Commander-in-Chief, including for the conduct of intelligence operations.”

According to the Boston Globe, Addington has been the “leading architect” of these signing statements, which have been added to more than seven hundred and fifty laws. He reportedly scrutinizes every bill before President Bush signs it, searching for any language that might impinge on Presidential power...[emphasis mine]
The future of the U.S. as a constitutional republic is in grave danger.

02 July 2006



Pride week continued...

So, Friday and Saturday I attended the Future Queer Conference at University College Dublin. I was invited to be on a panel along with British photographer Sara Davidmann, British FTM activist Robert Allfree, and British MTF activist Gill Dalton (who's been living in Dublin for the last year and a half, busily setting up a trans support group and other organisations).

It’s the first time I’ve ever been invited to be on an academic panel and I was excited and nervous. Sara, Robert and Gill were all incredible, articulate, heartfelt, courageous and each utterly remarkable. Not for the first time, I marveled at how lucky I am to be numbered among such company. I wouldn't trade such an honor to have been born male, even to possess a penis.

People said I was great too, though to be honest I departed from my script and was all over the place, so I don't really have a feel for how I did. I talked about how the queer community feels like home to me because queer-identified people embrace ambiguity and complex identities, like mine, and are comfortable with the evolution and elasticity of identity. Many also understand how utterly inadequate traditional definitions are. What I intended to then go on and discuss included the topics of FTM invisibility, transgender inclusion/exclusion, political infighting and the way trannies embody queerness.

If you're curious, I've continued with my text (the one I didn't exactly follow) below the fold.

(To continue) it’s interesting because while my very existence challenges pat definitions, at this point in my life my queerness is anything but obvious. I “pass” so well that under normal circumstances, I appear disappointedly normal. And while this helps me find a job and spares me from the very real and scary transphobia out there, it’s problematic in other ways.

Most importantly: finding a date!! Jeeze, I walk into a queer bar and the women look away while most guys, once they find out my, uh, anatomy, lose interest.

Another matter: my queerness utterly disappears when I’m dating a woman. I end up coming across as a somewhat effeminate, straight guy. I don’t mind the effeminate part, but straight?!

The few times I’ve talked with questioning gender-queer butches who were struggling to sort out their identities and were wondering if they might be happier transitioning, I’ve said that one of the biggest things they’d be giving up if they transition is the ready-made, wonderful women’s community. Sure, it can be difficult at times, with the in-fighting and the passionate sometimes incestuous relationships. But it’s there for you! In every major western city, just inside the door of the local dyke bar!

I really miss that. The way my visible queerness used to make me an integral part of the dyke community. There’s no counterpart for FTMs, even in cities with a critical mass of FTMs, like San Francisco. And community is even scarcer in places like Dublin, where both queer and FTM numbers are small.

It can sometimes feel very lonely as an FTM, even in the midst of the larger LGB population.

In the early days of my transition, I tried to overcome my creeping invisibility by externalising my differentness. I looked a lot more “androgynous” then, which helped. It gave me an edgier look to start off, which I heightened with body piercings; blue, yellow and other coloured hair; and experimental clothing “looks”—some that worked better than others! Like an adolescent, it took me a while to realise that many of the “edgier” looking people I was trying to emulate in truth weren’t radical or subversive. And conversely, that a lot of the people who didn’t visually stand out, were.

So, in the larger picture, where does Lesbian, Gay and Bi end, and queer begin? And how to they all intersect with trans?

In my experience, the larger LGB community often shuns the label of queer—to this day, even after all the years of radicals reclaiming it! And their discomfort extends to the tranny community, which they would prefer to disavow. The discomfort is evident in the arguments, both here and abroad, that greet proposed trans inclusion in LGB organisations and legislation. It’s one way we trannies are reminded of our outsider status, even within the LGB community, and it’s a sort of discrimination non-tranny queers are privileged not to face.

This LGB disavowal, which intensifies in proportion to how conservative and committed to assimilation the lesbian, gay or bi person or organisation is, is often couched in terms of political expediency. A prominent example is the long fight in the US over trans inclusion in ENDA (the Employment Nondiscrimination Act). Which still hasn’t passed, right?! The rationale is that you fight first for LGB advancement, and then come back for us trannies. A rationale I reject as not only disingenuous, but a piss-poor political strategy.

What may surprise some on the LGB side of the debate is to find out that the discomfort is not only one way. Trannies, too, can be found who are uncomfortable with being lumped in with the LGBs. To my dismay, I’ve come across a fair number who express their unwillingness to attend support group meetings in openly gay venues--haven’t come across them here in Ireland yet, but I wager they exist. Even worse, I know FTMs who, after transition, go on to live closeted homophobic existences in which they repudiate all former connections with queer or LGB communities. And this after leading formerly VERY queer lives!

This discord brings up an interesting question, one I didn’t originate but which I rarely if ever hear discussed, namely, just who is excluding whom in this counterproductive argument? Reliable statistics are nonexistent, but were we talking numbers, it seems possible, maybe even likely, that LGB is a subset of T, rather than the other way around. That is, if we consider all the straight-identified and largely closeted male cross-dressers out there, and compare the sum total to people who identify as lesbian, gay or bi—or even the folks who don’t identify, but “practice” gay sex—trannies might outnumber the LGBs.

Furthermore, one could argue that the discrimination faced by LGB folk is predicated on behaviour perceived by the larger society to be transgendered. That is, homphobes believe males should love and mate with females and vice-versa, hence, a male loving a male contravenes gender roles. This argument is further supported by the distressing fact that, judging from my experience, it’s the most effeminate men and masculine women—straight or queer—who suffer the worst violence and discrimination.

Do you think LGB organisations would approach trans inclusion differently if they conceptualised the issue this way? That, actually, it could be trans folks who should be considering if we want to include LGBs in our organisations…?

In the end, such arguments and infighting only aid our enemies. The American Religious Right doesn’t distinguish in their rhetoric, legislation and hatred. LGB and T of all stripes are the target-of-choice whenever the Bush/Cheney regime seeks to rally its Christinista base. And, in the way of such bigotry, their official actions trickle down to the street level. I speak as someone who has had the dubious distinction of being vibed or out rightly threatened as a dyke, a fag, and a bisexual man.

Which brings me to my next point, which is how trans folks embody the very essence of queerness. To illustrate, as an FTM who eschews lower surgery, I’ve forfeited the luxury of disregarding the shortcomings inherent in simple, binary identity definitions. My existence as a man without a penis, in a world where the penis is THE defining characteristic, gives lie to the validity of the binary categories. I could walk around fully clothed my whole life, closeted, hidden, and thereby not significantly challenging any hegemony. But even if I did, an accident which, say, put me in the hospital unconscious, or an arrest at a political demonstration, or an unfortunate strip-search at a border, could abruptly toss me back into the center of controversy. Where I’d be at risk of ridicule, discrimination, or worse, violence, sexual assault and even death.

Beyond safety, basic, widely-held definitions and language simply breaks down with trannies. For example, am I engaged in “gay” sex when I’m with a gay male? A dyke? A straight female? Another FTM?

Ever?

I remember once, an ex-boyfriend and I were driving in my little jeep Suzuki, its bumper plastered with various political bumper stickers, when we were vibed by a trio of straight boys in an adjoining car. No words were exchanged, and as such encounters go, it was extremely mild, but it was apparent that our obvious queerness along with the lefty bumper stickers, offended them. I remember wondering later, would they have been reassured to know that my ex and I engaged in the same sort of sex they (probably) had with their girlfriends? That, contrary to what they were assuming, we didn’t engage in “homosexual” sex by the strict definition. Unlike the charge often leveled at queers that what we do is “unnatural,” –-far from true according to zoological studies-- and that “the body parts don’t fit,” actually they did fit, even by straight definitions. So would those guys have felt any better had they known that?

Somehow, I doubt it.

Obviously, the reason we irk the Right has nothing to do with biology, and everything to do with ideology. I’d venture to say that at the heart of the matter, it’s the fact that queers believe first and foremost in our right to engage freely in sex for pleasure. To the puritanical Right, who’d like to turn back the clock to a time when birth-control was unavailable, abortion illegal (as it still sadly is here in Ireland) and all sex relegated to the “lawfully married" heterosexual bedroom, the sex we have upsets them! Not just because we do it for pleasure, with procreation optional, but additionally because our sex is between equals.

Well, by my definition anyway. For integral to my definition of queer sex is not that the participants possess like bodies and/or genders, but rather that queer sex leaves everything open to negotiation. There are no assumptions. No givens. No hard and fast rules that this has to happen, or that, in order for it to be “sex” or to be “right.” Ideally, everything must be negotiated beforehand and/or during, subtly or through clear give-and-take. Which means essentially, the act is unfolding between (or among) equals.

To me, this strikes at the very heart of “compulsory heterosexuality,” which not only seeks to equate and restrain sex strictly to procreation, but, in the process, imbues the encounter with the inherent inequality of the larger society. In the extreme version, you have the Religious Right’s non-satirical "God-given" edict that "a wife must submit to her husband’s will,” in the bedroom and elsewhere. UGH!

Thus, as a reflection of the body I have, I ascribe to the broader Wikopedia definition of “queer” that includes heterosexuals whose sexual attitudes and/or preferences not only place them outside the mainstream (such as BDSM practitioners or polyamorists) but who approach sex and gender with the attitude that it’s all up for negotiation among equals. In the same way, I’d be inclined to exclude from the definition those gays and lesbians who approach sex and gender in a traditionalist way that conforms to society’s binary categories.

As an aside, to the charge that transsexuals actually reinforce the binary gender system by resorting to hormones and/or surgery, I strongly disagree! Some trannies are rebels, others are not. Some subvert the binary, heteronormative system, others do everything they can to conform and fit in. As I read recently on one of my favorite blogs, Alas a blog, why are trannies singled out for this criticism? Why are we not afforded the same opportunity as non-trannies to either support or subvert the binary gender system by our conduct, beliefs, actions, etc?

So, in conclusion, as a mother who is a man, a man who feels that being pregnant, giving birth and mothering my daughter was one of the best things I ever did—and who, by the way, doesn’t believe that detracts from my identity as a man—I believe queer-identified trannies have much to offer the non-tranny world. First, many of us, as a result of our having lived on both sides of the great gender divide, can offer valuable observations on the damaging ways men and women interact and misunderstand one another.

Also, we have keen insight into the way gender operates in league with power in our society. Gender is used to enforce and maintain entrenched power relationships throughout the generations. When used in this way, it hurts everyone, straight, queer, bi and tyranny alike, to greater or lesser degrees. Because the system fails people like me so glaringly, we’re forced to assume the roles of “outsiders” from a very early age. And cultural outsiders make great critics. We know from a deep place, the inherent fallacy of those “basic truths” everyone takes for granted.

At a time when reactionary forces are marshaling throughout the world to entrench not only oppressive gender systems but oppressive economic, cultural and political systems, people who can point to the inherent phoniness at the heart of the arguments are valuable.

In the end, when we—trannies and queers—come out and live our lives honestly, our lives themselves becomes revolutionary. Our existences alone, thereby go far toward subverting the heteronormal hegemony, otherwise known as the "dominant paradigm."

29 June 2006

Death of a salesman's (expectations)....

This column by commentator extraordinaire, George Monbiot, discusses the demise of social and economic mobility in the US and Britain, accompanied by rising expectations among the young.
…A survey published in April by the economist Tom Hertz showed that the United States has one of the lowest levels of intergenerational mobility in the rich world. A child born into a poor family has a 1% chance of growing up to become one of the richest 5%, while a child born into a wealthy family has a 22% chance. Another study, published by Business Week, found that in 1978 23% of adult men whose fathers were in the bottom quartile made it into the top quartile. In 2004 the figure was 10%. But reality and public perceptions are travelling in opposite directions. A poll for the New York Times published in 2005 showed that 80% of respondents thought it was possible for poor people to become wealthy by working hard. In 1983 the figure was only 60%.

[snip]

Here too, declining mobility is accompanied by rising expectations. In January the Learning and Skills Council found that 16% of the teenagers it interviewed believed they would become famous, probably by appearing on a show like Big Brother. Many of them saw this as a better prospect than obtaining qualifications; 11% of them, it found, were "sitting around 'waiting to be discovered' ". The council claimed that the probability of being chosen by Big Brother and of becoming rich and famous as a result is 30 million to one. But the promise held out to us is that it can happen to anyone. The teenagers seemed to believe it can happen to everyone.
To read the whole thing, go here.
Staff Sergeant Raymond Plouhar, 30, killed by a roadside bomb in Anbar province, Iraq. Photograph: US Marine Corps/AP

Staff Sergeant Raymond Plouhar RIP....

The US Marine recruiter pictured in Fahrenheit 9/11 trying to persuade young men from the economically bleak town of Flint, Michigan, to enlist has been killed by a roadside bomb in Iraq, the Pentagon said.

Staff Sergeant Raymond Plouhar, 30, died on Monday of wounds suffered while on duty in Anbar province. He had barely a month left of his tour of duty in Iraq, where he was in charge of detecting and detonating makeshift bombs.
What he was shown doing in F-9/11 was low-down. But his death is still a waste of a young life. And it's probably the last thing he ever thought would happen when he agreed to be in Moore's film.

Complete story here.

28 June 2006


Archbishop of Canterbury, the "Most Rev." Rowan Williams.
[photo:Chris Radburn/Press Association, via Associated Press]

WWJD...?
In a defining moment in the Anglican Communion's civil war over homosexuality, the Archbishop of Canterbury proposed a plan yesterday that could force the Episcopal Church in the United States either to renounce gay bishops and same-sex unions or to give up full membership in the Communion.
And they call themselves Christians. How utterly sad.

Complete story here.

27 June 2006


Oink, oink...!

Barbara Ehrenreich rocks! From her blog:

The Piggery Award
While pondering Congress’s rejection of a minimum wage increase this week, it’s helpful to recall the basic taxonomic distinction between Predators and Pigs. Predators – in this case, those who employ people at unlivable wages – suck the marrow out of their employees, transform eager young women into stress-injured cripples, and virtually orphan the children whose parents are forced to work two or more jobs to support them.

Pigs, on the other hand, sit by wriggling with delight at these cannibalistic proceedings. It’s their job to oink out choruses of praise for the Predators. “Predation is Prosperity!” they proclaim, all the while hoping that some little scraps of flesh will fall their way.
Read the whole piece here.

Dillon
Michael Laurence Dillon, world's first known FTM.

Pride week in Dublin....

I’m scheduled to give a brief talk on transsexual health issues with an MTF friend on Thursday here. (On my lunch break from my corporate job and unbeknownst to my bosses at he bank!) To be followed by a question-and-answer period.

A lot of people don’t realize that sexual orientation is totally separate from gender identity. Thus, while transgendered folks and issues generally get lumped under the LGB banner, the grouping makes further sense because regardless of a person’s sexual-orientation before transition, afterwards trans folks can end up as straight, gay, queer, or bi.

Kinda like the rest of humanity.

Another little known fact is that the first FTM known to employ hormone therapy and surgery was Irish . Michael Laurence Dillon, born Laura Maud Dillon in 1915 in London, the daughter of Robert Dillon of Lismullen, County Meath. Entered Trinity College Medical School in 1945 and graduated in 1951. He practiced medicine at sea and was eventually outed because Burke’s Peerage refused to change his name and sex in their listing so that he could be identified as next in line to his childless brother to inherit their family's title. A reporter stumbled on the information and published a story about his sex-change. So the story goes, Michael was so mortified that he left Ireland and moved to India, where he joined a monastery, was ordained in Tibetan Buddhism and died in a monastery in 1962, at the young age of 47.

So I'm following in a proud Irish FTM tradition.

Another fact. “Lower” or genital surgery is problematic for FTM’s. It’s prohibitively expensive, carries a high risk of sexual or urinary problems afterwards, and offers poor “cosmetic” results.

Therefore, many—perhaps even most—FTMs at this time chose to skip it. We will undergo a double-mastectomy or cosmetic surgery to reduce breast size and re-sculpt our chest. And we'll inject testosterone to produce secondary sexual characteristics. The testosterone works very well, as you can see by my photo. Which means that FTMs can end up living long lives as men without penises. Which has profound implications for healthcare and our sexual lives.

Among other things it may mean that a person looks like me, but has to seek gynecological care. This, naturally, is something we’d much rather avoid. But avoidance could, in a worst case scenario, cost us our lives, as routine pap-smears can detect cervical cancer early enough to successfully treat it.

In the past, females who cross-lived sometimes died rather than seek out medical care for curable health problems. Being outed, apparently, was considered a fate worse than death. One famous example was jazz musician, Billy Tipton. Born one year before Michael Dillon, in 1914 in the US, he cross-lived his entire adult life. He was married five times, told each of his wives that he had been in a grave car accident that had left him with genital disfigurement and sterility, and so they apparently never saw him naked nor had sexual intercourse. He adopted three boys. Only his parents, brother, and cousins knew he had been born female.

In 1989, Billy suffered from hemorrhaging ulcers and refused to call a doctor. After his death, the coroner told his family the truth of his biological sex. None of his adopted sons, ex-wives, associates or band members have ever admitted to previously knowing he was born female.

In my own case, I always come out to my doctors. I do this as a matter of principle: I feel it’s both good for them to understand that life isn’t necessarily so black and white as they might think, and it’s important for me to get the best healthcare possible. It's sometimes an unnerving experience. A few times, the doctor or nurse has been so visibly flummoxed by my revelation that they’ve been obviously too distracted to give me even the most basic care. Luckily, this has never occurred in the context of a critical emergency—and I sincerely hope it never does.

But imagine if a person like me has a serious accident, one that renders us unconscious. We’ll be there helpless and in need of medical help and the doctor or nurse will be confronted with a person who looks male, but who was clearly born female. This is a scenario that freaks me out and one reason I feel it’s so important to educate medical care providers that we're out there.

The closest I came to this scenario was a bad bicycle accident I had. I was knocked unconscious for about 10 or 15 minutes, but luckily, I’d only started testosterone a week before. So though I looked very gender ambiguous, with short hair and men’s clothing, I’d had no surgery yet and was still without a beard and chest hair. So the nurses found no big surprise under my clothing.

The situation now would be very different.

26 June 2006



What have we wrought...?

Based on what many consider to be a low estimate, some 50,000 Iraqis have died violently since the US invasion in March, 2003. To put this in perspective, consider:
... the 50,000 number is daunting, particularly in a country with a population of about 26 million. "Proportionately," the Times says, "it is equivalent to 570,000 Americans being killed nationwide in the last three years." Put another way: It's as if the United States had suffered an attack of the magnitude of 9/11 once every five or six days since March 2003.[emphasis mine]

Salon story (quoting the LA Times) here. (Subscription required.)


A tale of two ledes....

I almost never read the New York Times anymore, although I'll frequently glance at the headlines.

I quit trusting their editorial judgment during the lead up to the Iraq invasion, so obvious was their slant in favor of Bush and the war. The Jayson Blair scandal confirmed my low opinion. Then they started to charge for op-eds. I finally reached my point of no return with Judith Miller's martyred posturing in prison and the paper's passionate defense of her.

Take a look at this headline and lede from today’s edition.

Militants' Raid on Israel Raises Gaza Tension
JERUSALEM, June 25 — In an ominous development, Israel threatened strong military action on Sunday after eight Palestinian militants in Gaza, including members of the governing faction Hamas, emerged from a secret tunnel dug 300 yards into Israel, killed two soldiers, wounded three and kidnapped another.
Compare it to the headline and lede on the same story in today’s (UK) Guardian.

Palestinians hunt for Israeli hostage
Palestinian security forces under the command of the Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas were desperately searching today for the Israeli soldier kidnapped by militants the previous day, as the army massing on Gaza's border stood poised to invade.
It's a mild, but noteworthy example of what bothers me about the NYT. The Guardian’s story conveys a strong sense of disorder, desperation and vulnerability on the part of the Palestinians. While the NYT gives the impression of two near equals, Israel and Palestine, poised in a military stand-off.

Which do you think is closest to the truth?

It only confirms my decision not to waste my valuable time on the formerly praiseworthy flagship publication.

The NYT story here and Guardian here.

25 June 2006




The credit card blues....

Got into a heated discussion with a friend of mine today. She felt that the reason there's so much consumer debt nowadays is that, due to rampant materialism, people habitually live beyond their means. I felt that the reason there's so much consumer debt nowadays is that most people don't make enough to live, so they use credit cards to make up the difference.

I was arguing from the perspective of someone socialised as a female in the 1950's, who even though I've been living for the past 12 years as a man am still making waaaayyy below what most men my age and with my level of education earn--heck, I'm making significantly less than my ex-girlfriend who's 28 years old and has a bachelor's degree (to my 50+ years old and master's degree).

And I was arguing from the perspective of someone from the working class, first person in my immediate family to not just finish college but earn a master's degree, albeit when I turned 41, and who raised my daughter mostly as a single parent.

My working life began at 16 when my mom brought home piece-work. Then I graduated to part-time library-page while still in high school.

After graduating high school on a college-prep track sixth in my class of more than 350 students, I got a job cleaning motel rooms. I didn't know any better: none of my high school counselors prompted me to apply for university. My mother had commited suicide when I was a junior and I was still reeling. And my dad, having never gone to college, didn't really understand the system. Several years later, when I landed my first office job, I thought I'd positively arrived.

Frustratingly, though I'm much better educated both formally and in the ways of the world, I've barely progressed salary-wise since then.

So, what do you think? Is frivolous, out-of-control middle-class spending mainly to blame for raging consumer debt? Or working people making too low of a wage to reasonably get by?

24 June 2006



Hello again y'all...!

I've decided to start publishing my blog again, after a hiatus of two years. During which time, a lot has happened, both in my life and across the globe!

But typical blogger I am, I've shot my wad tonight recovering my blog's previous posts and revamping this site (not done yet!), so I've no energy left to write! So instead, by way of introduction, I'm going to post a column I published in Dublin's Village magazine last year when I had a short-lived writing gig there.

I finally did it. After threatening to leave if Bush did this or Congress did that or Democrats sat idle while Republicans pulled another shenanigan, I left the U.S. Bush's invasion of Iraq was the final impetus, though it took me 15 months to wind up loose ends. I spent a week decompressing in Paris, then a Ryan Air flight set me down for the first time in Dublin. Given a 15kg-baggage-limit and a recent spate of unemployment, I began my life as an American expatriate with little more than the clothes on my back, Irish citizenship through my grandparents and a pocketful of credit cards.

Dublin's gray skies and Georgian architecture were a bit of a shock after opulent Paris. My youth hostel sat surrounded by pubs, and sleepless with jetlag, I wandered wide-eyed at 2 a.m. among inebriated revelers doing their unsteady best not to wander into traffic. Shouts, drunken laughter and the clip-clop of horses bounced off the walls of my room until seagulls took up their unholy din at dawn's early light.

A veritable teetotaler by Irish standards, my disquiet was compounded those first days by the fact I couldn't locate a bookstore, stationery store or fresh bakery anywhere amid the ubiquitous pubs. Dublin's shy demeanor confounded me, super-sized Yank that I am. I walked right past businesses that failed to shout their wares from the rooftops with proper neon, missing altogether their weatherworn hand-lettered signs. Monday morning, metal shutters lifted to reveal clothing shops, employment agencies, a Chinese food emporium. I found half-a-dozen bookstores near Trinity, a stationery store tucked beneath a news-shop and a supermarket in, of all places, a department store basement.

What convinced me to stay, though, wasn't bookstores or, surprise, the weather, but the people. You Irish are renowned worldwide for friendliness (though it helps a visitor, I've discovered, to be white and from America). My introduction to your cordiality occurred riding into town from the airport. A tiny elderly man in a rumpled three-piece suit was trying stiffly to board the bus. Everywhere I've lived, passengers would have trampled him in a rush, but here, everyone hung back respectfully until a young man reached down under the old gent's elbows, picked him up and placed him gently on the bus. At my stop, he tottered toward the exit and the driver enjoined, "Give 'em a 'and, wontcha?" but before I could untangle myself from luggage straps, your man had launched himself over the last step to land, two feet on the sidewalk. Such is the generosity here, gray skies and square buildings simply don't get me down.

Still, before I came my biggest fears about living in a foreign county centered around being a female-to-male transsexual. Would I have to hide my identity out of fear of job discrimination? Would medical personnel treat me as a freak? What if I never made friends?

My initial experiences have been encouraging. Ireland's public health system is short-staffed, under-funded and low-tech, still everyday care is progressive and generally more accessible than in America. First doctor's visit, I walked one block from work, registered with no appointment, waited 20 minutes, then was shown in. Visibly surprised by my disclosure, the doctor remained professional, helpful and polite and the 45 Euro cost was cheap by U.S. standards. Since then, I've seen GPs, an endocrinologist and had a mandatory exam for a permanent job: in every case, the doctors have been open-minded, sensitive and surprisingly astute.

But it's my pharmacist who really amazes me. In America, land of impersonal and frazzled service, I have never been treated with such care and attention to detail. Paul didn't bat an eye when I mentioned Outhouse, in the process identifying myself as transsexual. Not a hint of condescension greeted my request for a drugs discount card. When he saw a newer-generation European drug was to replace my former prescription, he sat me down for a baseline blood-pressure reading. Then special-ordered needles for injecting testosterone and telephoned, once to let me know delivery had been delayed; a second time to say they'd arrived.

Such kindness and consideration illustrate, among other things, Dublin's forward-thinking attitudes toward the LGBT (Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgendered) community at a time when such sentiment is fast going underground in the United States. When Republicans attacked gays in last year's presidential election, not a single Democratic contender had the courage to declare himself in favor of gay marriage. I believe Ireland will legalize it before the United States, and I plan to be here to see it.

11 June 2004


A breath of fresh air...

Amid a week nauseating Reagan-worship:
...Calling Reagan an "all-American" insults the millions of Americans whom he deprived of his sunlight. Reagan far too often invited the nation to live down to its lowest common denominators. Reagan tried to make America younger, all right. He tried to return us to the days where we sat before black-and-white televisions, in separate black and white neighborhoods, where white people saw only white people and black people were represented by Buckwheat and the only time you saw lots of people of color were dead Indians in Westerns.
Complete op-ed here.

And more realism here if you have access to Salon.

10 June 2004


Reagan spectacle....

...They were the first of thousands of Americans who descended on Washington to say their own goodbyes.
Is that "thousands" as in "I took home $20,000 after taxes last year," or "thousands" as in the estimated half-million protestors who greeted President Bush in Rome last week?

On Tuesday evening in Manhattan, John Hockenberry of NBC (speaking to an audience of some 700-800 people) said the media was expecting a "hundred thousand" mourners to file through the rotunda in honor of Ronald Reagan.

If that was a peace demonstration, such a poor turnout would make it a failure. And it certainly wouldn't attract the media attention the Reagan funeral rites are garnering!

This circus over Reagan's death is like a huge circle-jerk, with each media outlet striving to outdo the other and in the process exciting themselves to an even greater pitch.

Sadly, they don’t seem to realize that everyone outside their circle doesn’t share their enthusiasm.

Excerpt from here.

08 June 2004


Who killed Nick Berg...?

This column in the Sydney Morning Herald sums up pretty well the inconsistencies in the Nick Berg video that suggest he may have been killed in a "black ops" action by the C.I.A.
...Possum believes "the available evidence surrounding the case suggests that it was a 'black operation' by US psychological warfare specialists ... to provide the media with a moral relativity argument to counter the adverse publicity over torture at Abu Ghraib". The use of FBI footage in the opening sequence, if confirmed, suggests the involvement of high-level US Government operatives....
Read it here.